From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Sat Aug 22 1998 - 07:55:59 MDT
At 10:52 AM 8/14/98 -0400, Brian Atkins wrote:
>I saw this on tv last night:
>
>http://www-aero.meche.rpi.edu/Research/LaserPropulsion/index.html
>
>They claim it will reduce launch costs for small satellites
>by "several orders of magnitude" within something like 5
>years.
>
>But I can't find any exact figures. Does anyone have an idea
>of about how many dollars/pound (or kg) we are talking about
>here, and will this thing really make it possible for the
>average joe (or company) to have their own satellites?
Laser Focus World (a laser trade magazine) had a nice article on this
project a few months ago. I don't recall any cost figures in that article.
The web site mentioned above has more nice pictures, but less text than the
LFW article.
I think 5 years is optimistic due to possible guidance problems, the little
model has little or no manuvering capacity, and though there are methods
for compensating for air turbulence, these are low power methods and I
don't think they can be applied for high power IR lasers.
In the long term, this has great potential. LEO requires about 20Kwh/Kg, or
about $2.60/Kg at my local PG&E ripoff rates. At 1% system efficiency, this
is $260/Kg, definitely an improvement over the $3000/Kg for the Space
Shuttle. (Note: IR CO2 lasers operate at about 15%, so we have a 15x fudge
factor here)
As for average joe satellites, when costs get this low, orbits become a
scarce resource, just as they are for geosynch slots right now. And such
resources become by necessity regulated.....
O--------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
| |
| Death is for animals; |
| immortality for gods. |
| Technology is the means by |
| which we make the transition. |
O--------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:29 MST