Truth?

From: The SHO master c.c. (98097@sh.dc.k12.mn.us)
Date: Tue May 19 1998 - 13:53:53 MDT

• Next message: Max More: "Rupert Sheldrake completely loses it"
• Previous message: Mark Crosby: "Re: Public Funding vs Free Inquiry"
• Next in thread: EvMick: "Re: Truth?"
• Maybe reply: EvMick: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: ChuckKuecker: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: Ian Goddard: "Truth? YES!!"
• Maybe reply: I'll : "Re: Truth?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Can we really put a definite definition to the word truth?

If you believe we can then consider:

1. truth is in the eye of the beholder
  2. bias truth
     a. hitler is viewed as evil by the majority for ordering the
death of millions, yet Einstien is viewed as good when in actuality
he killed millions more than hitler
     b. Columbus discovered America, usually discovery is of the unknown (America was already known, and inhabited) and he never saw
America
3. my truth is not necessarily your truth, and yours not mine
4. truth is only a test of you collected knowledge, there fore the
more knowledge the more truth
5. all truth has the option of being bias

SHO

• Next message: Max More: "Rupert Sheldrake completely loses it"
• Previous message: Mark Crosby: "Re: Public Funding vs Free Inquiry"
• Next in thread: EvMick: "Re: Truth?"
• Maybe reply: EvMick: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: ChuckKuecker: "Re: Truth?"
• Reply: Ian Goddard: "Truth? YES!!"
• Maybe reply: I'll : "Re: Truth?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:06 MST