From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:56:00 MST
In a message dated 1/25/01 6:08:30 PM Central Standard Time,
charlie@antipope.org writes:
> In a spirit of non-confrontational rationalism, I'd like to see if we
> can compose a list of ideas that we *ALL* agree on.
>
> If you disagree with any of these memes, could you wave a hand and
> explain why?
>
> 1. Forcing our fellow human beings to live their lives as we see fit
> is unethical. (Persuading them of the error of their ways so that
> they _choose_ to live their lives by our lights is another matter.)
>
> 2. Initiating violence against someone is wrong; self-defense is right.
>
> 3. The scientific method provides a better way of evaluating reality
> than any religious dogma.
>
> 4. Progress (increases in human intelligence, longevity, wealth, and
> happiness) is possible.
>
> 5. Central control is usually less efficient than distributed control.
>
> 6. Empowering people to learn, work, and transcend their limits is a good
> thing.
100% agreement from me.
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
ICQ # 61112550
"We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
-- Desmond Morris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:05:21 MST