Re: here we are in the future already, then

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sun Dec 31 2000 - 16:41:39 MST

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
Previous message: Jason Joel Thompson: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 10:36 AM 31/12/00 EST, you wrote:

>In a message dated 12/31/2000 8:00:48 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au writes:
>
><< Millennium, folks!

No it fucking wasn't dated 12/31/00, it was dated Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:42
+1100. Aargh, stupid software.

Damien Broderick

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
Previous message: Jason Joel Thompson: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:37 MST