Re: here we are in the future already, then

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sun Dec 31 2000 - 08:36:36 MST

• Next message: Barbara Lamar: "arcology & permaculture (was generic density increase / calendar control)"
• Previous message: scerir@libero.it: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "here we are in the future already, then"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 12/31/2000 8:00:48 AM Eastern Standard Time,
d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au writes:

<< Millennium, folks!
 
 Damien Broderick >>
Everything's up to date in Australia. New year, New century, New millennium.
Not enough technological progress to suit most of us. Bleh!

• Next message: Barbara Lamar: "arcology & permaculture (was generic density increase / calendar control)"
• Previous message: scerir@libero.it: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "here we are in the future already, then"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: here we are in the future already, then"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:36 MST