Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: Emlyn (emlyn@one.net.au)
Date: Tue Dec 26 2000 - 10:44:17 MST


Sorry guys... this was supposed to be ironic. I forget the limitations of
the medium!

Emlyn

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anders Sandberg" <asa@nada.kth.se>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

> "Emlyn" <emlyn@one.net.au> writes:
>
> > Lucky science isn't grounded in philosophy, or we'd all be up the creek.
>
> Oh dear, science largely developed from philosophy and if you want to
> read up on the foundations of science you go to the philosophy
> bookshelves rather than the science ones...
>
> (Actually, pancritical rationalism in some sense makes scientific
> foundations at somewhat empirical, but you still have to do some
> philosophical thinking there)
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
> asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
> GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:33 MST