From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Date: Mon Nov 13 2000 - 15:43:04 MST
Actually that NH hotspot is the ground zero of the new england Buchananites,
which won NH for Buchanan against the elder Bush in 1992.
CurtAdams@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/13/00 10:40:15 AM, rhanson@gmu.edu cites:
>
> >>Of the studies on the web page I noted this is by far the best and most
> >>comprehensive
> >>
> >>http://elections.fas.harvard.edu/
> >>Dr. Alexander Tabarrok
>
> Impressive that he could get this out so fast. I note in
> http://elections.fas.harvard.edu/node3.html
> that this isn't the only really outrageous Buchanan outlier, just the only
> only one that would make a difference. (Actually Richmond, NH, might
> make a difference too). Makes me wonder how much hanky-panky,
> intentional or otherwise, is going on. Do they use these kinds of
> things as process quality control? Seems logical that any outlier should
> be investigated for possible irregularities. This would be particularly
> useful where irregularities are unintentional, as in Palm Beach.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:56 MST