From: Everitt Mickey (evmick@pnv.net)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2000 - 19:55:37 MDT
I agree...but i also think that the reverse (obverse?...converse?) should
also be the case...that is...that it should be a constitutional right that
bodily modifications ......IF DESIRED.......should be allowed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross A. Finlayson <raf@tiki-lounge.com>
To: extropians@extropy.org <extropians@extropy.org>
Date: Monday, August 14, 2000 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Human ID implant to be unveiled soon
>I think that no one, ever, should be required to accept any implant.
>
>It should be a constitutional right to be free of bodily modification in
any way.
>--
>Ross Andrew Finlayson
>Finlayson Consulting
>Ross at Tiki-Lounge: http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~raf/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:28 MST