From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 07:14:28 MST
In a message dated 03/17/2000 8:58:54 AM Eastern Standard Time,
sarah.marr@dial.pipex.com writes:
> Possibly so. Thinking about it, it seems likely that any resurrection would
> be carried out on a case-by-case basis by interested individuals, rather
> than through some global effort. That might mean that such people would not
> be 'reinstituted', although (1) doubtless some far-right group would love
to
> see Hitler popping round for tea and biscuits and (2) no-one is sure who
> Jack-the-ripper was, so if s/he was resurrected, who'd call for justice
> against him/her?
I seem to remember an old NPR reading of the Russian Poet, Voznesenzki
(hooked on Phonics works for me!) reading that the dead are judged not by a
Holy Tribunal, but by a worker's committee deciding the actions of one of
their peers. Perhaps an all-around pimp-slapping for Adork & Uncle Joe
Stalin might be in order?
>Ah! A thought: at least those people given the death penalty and
>subsequently cleared could be brought back. Boy, would they be pissed.
> Sarah
A more critical issue (for me) is the How questions of "resurrection"; like,
by what means might such a strange thing be successfully accomplished? I
have read Tipler's stuff, and Hans Moravec's Mind Children and Robot; but
there appears to be nobody else having written essays on this, even as an
intellectual exercise. Where's all the philosophers and scholars at,
regarding this??
Spud
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:27 MST