From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 10:52:47 MST
In a message dated 3/13/00 2:14:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
charlie@antipope.org writes:
> Is anyone contemplating the possibility that senescence in mammals and
> some other vertebrates may be due to the presence of one or more archaic
> retroviruses?
Yes. See Woodruff and Nitikin, 1995, in Genetical Research.
Technically they're looking at a DNA transposable element
rather than an endogenous retrovirus but I suspect the
principle is the same.
My Mac monitor is dead at the moment so I can't give you
an exact cite.
>Such a virus wouldn't be
>selected out if it had a long, slow onset -- as witness the appearance
>of CJD being a hereditary trait rather than a very slow infection that
>is transmitted to the next generation in utero, long before the mother
>succumbs to it. It'd need some sort of "reset switch" (triggered at time
>of meiosis, maybe?)
Meiosis does indeed "reset" some transposable elements, although the
effect sometimes goes in the wrong direction, i.e., activity declines with
age and then pops back up in the next generation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:21 MST