Re: Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?

From: Anton Sherwood (bronto@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2000 - 17:57:52 MST

Next message: D.den Otter: "Re: further memespread, anti-nanotech/singularity"
Previous message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: near anything boxes allowed to br in the hands of the public?"
In reply to: Timothy Bates: "Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Next in thread: Doug Jones: "Re: Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Reply: Doug Jones: "Re: Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Timothy Bates wrote:
> As a disbeliever in patents, this article warmed my heart,
> http://www.around.com/patent.html

My monitor is 1600 pixels wide and the article still slops over. Does
everyone see that, or is it a bug in my browser (NS 4.61 for Linux)?

-- 
Anton Sherwood  *\\*  br0nt0@p0b0x.com  *\\*  http://www.jps.net/antons/

Next message: D.den Otter: "Re: further memespread, anti-nanotech/singularity"
Previous message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: near anything boxes allowed to br in the hands of the public?"
In reply to: Timothy Bates: "Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Next in thread: Doug Jones: "Re: Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Reply: Doug Jones: "Re: Patent breakthrough- maybe we don't need them after all?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:19 MST