Mail Y2K bug?

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@piclab.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 10:09:08 MST

Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
In reply to: Ken Clements: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Maybe reply: m: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> ...(OTOH, I can't find postings from
> Lee Daniel Crocker because he won't fix his Y2K problem.)

That's the first I've heard of a problem. I sent myself some
test messages and all the dates appear correct. Is anyone else
having a problem with my messages (other than content, that is:)?
They're being sent from a server I own, so I can certainly fix
whatever's wrong.

--
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC

Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
In reply to: Ken Clements: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Maybe reply: m: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:52 MST