Re: No, no, *I*'m the toad! *I* get to be the toad! Me! Me! (was Re: For your amusement [Fwd: Your 'Dogma'])

From: Emlyn (pentacle@enternet.com.au)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 03:43:23 MST

• Next message: Charlie Stross: "Re: ASTRO: Dark Matter problem gets worse!"
• Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Can We 'Break the Universe'? Re: False Vacuums."
• In reply to: Octavio Rojas Diaz: "Re: No, no, *I*'m the toad! *I* get to be the toad! Me! Me! (was Re: For your amusement [Fwd: Your 'Dogma'])"
• Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: No, no, *I*'m the toad! *I* get to be the toad! Me! Me! (was Re: For your amusement [Fwd: Your 'Dogma'])"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Octavio wrote:
> hmmmmmmmm, not really bufotenin (the alkaloid toads produce) is very
enjoyable
>
> for some people, there are even places where dried toad skins are sold to
be
> smoked
>
> I've never tried the substance so I don't know what kind of trip it
produces,
> but I suppose
> it must be pleasant for some and really digusting for others
>

My "knowledge" is purely hearsay, and restricted to the cane toad. If you've
seen one, you would not lick it.

Emlyn

• Next message: Charlie Stross: "Re: ASTRO: Dark Matter problem gets worse!"
• Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Can We 'Break the Universe'? Re: False Vacuums."
• In reply to: Octavio Rojas Diaz: "Re: No, no, *I*'m the toad! *I* get to be the toad! Me! Me! (was Re: For your amusement [Fwd: Your 'Dogma'])"
• Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: No, no, *I*'m the toad! *I* get to be the toad! Me! Me! (was Re: For your amusement [Fwd: Your 'Dogma'])"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:33 MST