path: root/fe/faba1b48ce142a8f407c7ce4f079de54da46af

Return-Path: <jlrubin@mit.edu>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB893C001E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:06:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E0A6FC4B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:06:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NfH-DPAkypYL
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:05:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F9660A79
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:05:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com
 [209.85.167.51]) (authenticated bits=0)
 (User authenticated as jlrubin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
 by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 20DJ5reM025039
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT)
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:05:56 -0500
Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id o12so6254244lfu.12
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:05:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BaTUUCT3St39ungntE9UXzr24dvpDuVL7sR2KK1iEPD0qifOy
 M4hw3vGTn/doeHYBaG5NysDezZEPyZWq31+XnBM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTUFbKHz2dQqM0xzSyRlPxMT8hNLiPof3cvZ8l1swJWj4hDnna9LnZwnY3s2x/iAGxpQXCfbyhCGjbqw6Kx14=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:33ce:: with SMTP id
 d14mr3236445lfg.516.1642100753417; 
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:05:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MtHvJYE--J-2@tutanota.de>
 <CABu3BAdUhFeCYtbs4HCV+c5rhurLYbf8tebX1UgZp+DathwxDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABu3BAdUhFeCYtbs4HCV+c5rhurLYbf8tebX1UgZp+DathwxDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:05:42 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5xwhhub2tBxQT7X0P_apNocABMQWXUcCO=1-Dc--W8_T8O5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5xwhhub2tBxQT7X0P_apNocABMQWXUcCO=1-Dc--W8_T8O5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Lee <steven.j.lee@gmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000017ca5a05d57b6020"
Cc: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>, info@bitcoindefensefund.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:06:00 -0000

--00000000000017ca5a05d57b6020
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

A further point -- were it to be a norm if a contributor to something like
this be denied their full capacity for "free speech" by social convention,
it would either encourage anonymous funding (less accountable) or would
disincentivize creating such initiatives in the future.

Both of those outcomes would be potentially bad, so I don't see limiting
speech on an unrelated topic as a valid action.

However, I think the inverse could have merit -- perhaps funders can
somehow commit to 'abstracting' themselves from involvement in cases / the
process of accepting prospective clients. As neither Alex nor Jack are
lawyers (afaict?), this should already be true to an extent as the legal
counsel would be bound to attorney client privilege.

Of course we live in a free country and however Jack and Alex determine
they should spend their own money is their god-given right, as much as it
is unfortunately the right of anyone to sue a developer for some alleged
infringement. I'm personally glad that Jack and Alex are using their money
to help developers and not harass them -- many thanks for that!

One question I have is how you might describe the differences between what
BLDF can accomplish and what e.g. EFF can accomplish. Having been
represented by the EFF on more than one occasion, they are fantastic. Do
you feel that the Bitcoin-specific focus of BLDF outweighs the more general
(but deeper experience/track record) of an organization like the EFF (or
others, like Berkman Cyberlaw Clinic, etc)? My main opinion is "the more
the merrier", so don't consider it a critique, more a question so that you
have the opportunity to highlight the unique strengths of this approach.

Best,

Jeremy
--
@JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
<https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>


On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:50 AM Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I think the word "The" is important. The title of the email and the name
> of the fund is Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. It is "a" legal defense fund;
> not THE Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. There is room for other funds and
> strategies and anyone is welcome to create alternatives.
>
> I also don't see why Alex or anyone should be denied the opportunity to
> comment on future soft forks or anything about bitcoin. Alex should have no
> more or less right to participate and his comments should be judged on
> their merit, just like yours and mine.
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:37 AM Prayank via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>>
>> > The main purpose of this Fund is to defend developers from lawsuits
>> regarding their activities in the Bitcoin ecosystem, including finding and
>> retaining defense counsel, developing litigation strategy, and paying legal
>> bills. This is a free and voluntary option for developers to take advantage
>> of if they so wish. The Fund will start with a corps of volunteer and
>> part-time lawyers. The board of the Fund will be responsible for
>> determining which lawsuits and defendants it will help defend.
>>
>> Thanks for helping the developers in legal issues. Appreciate your
>> efforts and I understand your intentions are to help Bitcoin in every
>> possible way.
>>
>>
>> Positives that I see in this initiative:
>>
>> 1.Developers don't need to worry about rich scammers and can focus on
>> development.
>>
>> 2.Financial help for developers as legal issues can end up in wasting lot
>> of time and money.
>>
>> 3.People who have misused courts to affect bitcoin developers will get
>> better response that they deserve.
>>
>>
>> I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make
>> sense:
>>
>> 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense
>> Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official
>> in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some
>> of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
>>
>> 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not
>> comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had
>> some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prayank
>>
>> A3B1 E430 2298 178F
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--00000000000017ca5a05d57b6020
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">A further point -- were i=
t to be a norm if a contributor to something like this be denied their full=
 capacity for &quot;free speech&quot; by social convention, it would either=
 encourage anonymous funding (less accountable) or would disincentivize cre=
ating such initiatives in the future.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" sty=
le=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"=
><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetic=
a,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Both of those outcomes would be=
 potentially bad, so I don&#39;t see limiting speech on an unrelated topic =
as a valid action.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:a=
rial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-s=
ize:small;color:#000000">However, I think the inverse could have merit -- p=
erhaps funders can somehow commit=C2=A0to=C2=A0&#39;abstracting&#39; themse=
lves from involvement in cases / the process of accepting prospective clien=
ts. As neither Alex nor Jack are lawyers (afaict?), this should already be =
true to an extent as the legal counsel would be bound to attorney client pr=
ivilege.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helve=
tica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;=
color:#000000">Of course=C2=A0we live in a free country and however Jack an=
d Alex determine they should spend their own money is their god-given right=
, as much as it is unfortunately the right of anyone to sue a developer for=
 some alleged infringement. I&#39;m personally glad that Jack and Alex are =
using their money to help developers and not harass them -- many thanks for=
 that!</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helveti=
ca,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_=
default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;co=
lor:#000000">One question I have is how you might describe the differences =
between what BLDF can accomplish and what e.g. EFF can accomplish. Having b=
een represented by the EFF on more than one occasion, they are fantastic. D=
o you feel that the Bitcoin-specific focus of BLDF outweighs the more gener=
al (but deeper experience/track record) of an organization like the EFF (or=
 others, like Berkman Cyberlaw Clinic, etc)? My main opinion is &quot;the m=
ore the merrier&quot;, so don&#39;t consider it a critique, more a question=
 so that you have the opportunity to highlight the unique strengths of this=
 approach.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,hel=
vetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:smal=
l;color:#000000">Best,</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fami=
ly:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;fo=
nt-size:small;color:#000000">Jeremy</div><div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gma=
il_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">--<br><a =
href=3D"https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank">@JeremyRubin</a>=
<a href=3D"https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank"></a></div></d=
iv></div><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D=
"gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:50 AM Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev &lt=
;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-sty=
le:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"l=
tr">I think the word &quot;The&quot; is important. The title of the email a=
nd the name of the fund is Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. It is &quot;a&quot; =
legal defense fund; not THE Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. There is room for o=
ther funds and strategies and anyone is welcome to create alternatives.<div=
><br></div><div>I also don&#39;t see why Alex or anyone should be denied th=
e opportunity to comment on future soft forks or anything about bitcoin. Al=
ex should have no more or less right to participate and his comments should=
=C2=A0be judged on their merit, just like yours and mine.</div></div><br><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan =
13, 2022 at 9:37 AM Prayank via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-d=
ev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoun=
dation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;=
border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div>
<div>Hi Jack,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto">&gt;=C2=A0The main purpose of this Fund is to defend =
developers from lawsuits regarding their activities in the Bitcoin ecosyste=
m, including finding and retaining defense counsel, developing litigation s=
trategy, and paying legal bills. This is a free and voluntary option for de=
velopers to take advantage of if they so wish. The Fund will start with a c=
orps of volunteer and part-time lawyers. The board of the Fund will be resp=
onsible for determining which lawsuits and defendants it will help defend.<=
br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks for helping t=
he developers in legal issues. Appreciate your efforts and I understand you=
r intentions are to help Bitcoin in every possible way.<br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Positives=
 that I see in this initiative:<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto">1.Developers don&#39;t need to worry about rich scammers and ca=
n focus on development.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"au=
to">2.Financial help for developers as legal issues can end up in wasting l=
ot of time and money.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto=
">3.People who have misused courts to affect bitcoin developers will get be=
tter response that they deserve.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div =
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I had few suggestions and feel fre=
e to ignore them if they do not make sense:<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br>=
</div><div dir=3D"auto">1.Name of this fund could be anything and &#39;The =
Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund&#39; can be confusing or misleading for newbies.=
 There is nothing official in Bitcoin however people believe things written=
 in news articles and some of them might consider it as an official bitcoin=
 legal fund.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">2.It wo=
uld be better if people involved in such important funds do not comment/inf=
luence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had some opinion=
s about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.<br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <b=
r></div><div>Prayank<br></div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">A3B1 E430 22=
98 178F<br></div>  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000017ca5a05d57b6020--