1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Rsbf3-000608-5S
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:59:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Rsbex-0001vM-RK
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:59:49 +0000
Received: by vcdn13 with SMTP id n13so1352234vcd.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:59:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.148.201 with SMTP id q9mr14950401vcv.33.1328108378393;
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.151.200 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:59:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D55C3D18-8286-44E9-B877-6FCE7C05E980@ceptacle.com>
References: <D55C3D18-8286-44E9-B877-6FCE7C05E980@ceptacle.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQ+zc_ji+8hzA8kvfBPTSpYVEsDSB6=6k8cC6R9vdfcdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=B8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Rsbex-0001vM-RK
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcement: libcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:59:49 -0000
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Michael Gr=C3=B8nager <gronager@ceptacle.co=
m> wrote:
> The libcoin/bitcoind client downloads the entire block chain 3.5 times fa=
ster than the bitcoin/bitcoind client. This is less than 90 minutes on a mo=
dern laptop!
Very interesting. Do you know where this speedup came from? It's not
typical for straight refactors that don't change datastructures and
the like to see such big speedups.
I see you have commented out code that disables fsync, which was my
first guess since I get big speedups from doing similar things.
|
