1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2869683D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com
[209.85.223.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EAE11D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iods203 with SMTP id s203so17398940iod.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=A2doJjMVESnVi3+wBUcgSLLAklwUHBgHq6RdlUi42S8=;
b=r95Bx85Zue4kjTET3BUCK2w9NSbgvNAYCD1REzsDhuQbDdhhUPYRIJYwqUo1wkAzhQ
1XHXEuzbueykO50EHQm4KuhRm9zDN1013h7ipesma+oKFyHQ3PMlL3HmrMs0jVkGeih9
5nOwjoEw8oKS0gnWPXnC6uZe5/KwoC1FWGkO7STVnW5Md/9NzkG4KxthhHYnFlv63vpW
ji2d0petwb9GG4mTf1ZDPlJ9eANXUQyXHEijfLZEgdBUK2A940NJkJ0nTIb1a5UrDswy
2WA9HKWL/B/2MN7OH+Zjxkbn5dPhl5zDjkCsel43CaEX99+OegzEVGE8ZdTRdaSQRHke
sd6Q==
X-Received: by 10.107.148.8 with SMTP id w8mr16848072iod.116.1440005554203;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.81.199 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTFkgGx0FxMiZ77inOZSs_+TQ88Wpj-q-c12COkO9tP4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTFkgGx0FxMiZ77inOZSs_+TQ88Wpj-q-c12COkO9tP4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:32:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzv+cKPY9wrAzbk5pgQJS0=R9KWu-+EuppM=nmXs8RHxYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:35 -0000
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Adam Back via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> ignored the warnings. Many also warned that 75% was an optimally BAD
> trigger ratio (and that in a hard fork it is not a miner vote really
> as in soft-forks). Gavin & Mike ignored that warning to. I know they
> heard those warnings because I told them 1:1 in person or via email
> and had on going conversations. Others did too.
I would like to add for the record, I also warned Gavin of this in his
PR to Bitcoin Core, and also suggested a timeout which if
activation/enforcement did not occur within, hard fork deployment
would be cancelled. His response was to delete these from the PR
claiming thresholds were not relevant conversation in his PR and
belonged elsewhere (even though they had already been discussed
elsewhere).
|
