1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6B6C002A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9AB6164F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org DA9AB6164F
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20221208 header.b=nh3X+460
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id C5x0afIjV-uc
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 7984060F5E
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7984060F5E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id
3f1490d57ef6-b9a6869dd3cso8436818276.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683666362; x=1686258362;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to
:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=oRwDDPIQCqFPgZiW7CgsBTvM2P27d+qKyCzdPDUkvqY=;
b=nh3X+460Rt/9kDRquOmznlRE0ctP/R6zAhH0ZlXyzC7NHXGie6Sf2+guHlZ0qHTwuy
Z/yIHBvLUYnyGQBn4+qjUpkMdjTHP21GXz1RjzBojsiCxF75myJ3EfhzbJKQPfI5I7+e
wlpBFuNhLdkrqUJucleqc8TOEsnTFTBVd8qC/gueidV+LQeRh1YhEcwgPPX2B7bJmbEB
dEy4uxgwWeauBBcLFEwCiAuUk+ZRBuRodHJey3il9OCh4wkvNclsCCKsMX4nUXuhpJy9
vuxtDSprHuO1XXQsdAcnXFFoeERaWiEx7733PF6WuKSFyudO1R0CU5oV8unVMcWkB1me
b0Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683666362; x=1686258362;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to
:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=oRwDDPIQCqFPgZiW7CgsBTvM2P27d+qKyCzdPDUkvqY=;
b=Qi3troSw8NxbEcbFKo61UTwzWprSgXOAu2lwVXMaQYHQGpkSNl/QeCPLOVrWSrsmuK
7TsLncqjlnqMa4ImH7vm60cpG46bD3OGNVb7iYAHgYNIsK4p+9c8BGPuzcz82EUVWmNk
cYMe64BwGDUhGj5RX+VU/UrFBb7XQ/BN+BgHHMye8l4H1RYLk5bXPhMTvFmcoFkGUbHG
jwECelLhc4V5RJ74K8O+xNyKXpGsceL2Q0HQXhV0OMbbJsInVI0SOrmvO1hikPij51E9
ZWz9tf9/J6QCK4nM3NsBe/g1xcSo4JPYbM0d+/VLsFAk20GmOn40u8ZFAb4r67bHi8Xo
Xfxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDywJyUTZDcCScLZ1Q2wAM1wG/smiJyGZkjFwD7ZymalczAQcIN8
9ovWBzzzO5wRdceIt3afpKEI0F5pjM6H8GCg2gY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ40tKtEjRtWeUtJixY16i9/tvKCuIdDOC/Y17pX+5e/ksIi1BoBiNSLvGWk6rClRYxw45mNCw==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa45:0:b0:b9e:883f:6a27 with SMTP id
s63-20020a25aa45000000b00b9e883f6a27mr15525598ybi.40.1683666362240;
Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:b950:d740:b1d9:f4cc:a7ea:2352?
([2600:1700:b950:d740:b1d9:f4cc:a7ea:2352])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
191-20020a2513c8000000b00b8f13ff2a8esm3263559ybt.61.2023.05.09.14.06.01
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2360b8ad-ac13-f180-fc95-4d5804184dd8@thinlink.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 14:06:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
References: <Lm_5F74G9G21ydrFPovvmtHWpNXcbVzZibmU80oNqFRehJjcll89-t7OXqS5Fooe0cTNxGreIREMql3Li2xUCe2T5NVyss3-CrLzISO09HY=@notatether.com>
<0aea4ec5-7d6a-f358-3c20-854001588031@dashjr.org>
<ZFmNq6NzH4ruDsER@petertodd.org>
<CAJowKgLJ5WSVBKPzWEiZFUcB1jZG2PWBNMyMXRdHXaZdAsHeoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgLJ5WSVBKPzWEiZFUcB1jZG2PWBNMyMXRdHXaZdAsHeoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 May 2023 11:57:12 +0000
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject
non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 21:06:06 -0000
On 5/9/23 09:32, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> obviously it's easy enough to evade if every non-economic user simply > keeps enough bitcoin around and sends it back to himself > > so
maybeit's a useless idea? but maybe that's enough of a hassle to stop >
people (it certainly breaks ordinals, since it can never be 1 sat)
Padding the change is not just a hassle, it requires holding extra BTC
in a hot wallet, which has a cost.
Spenders could also get around the rule by paying miners off-network,
but having to do so would be an appropriate penalty for broadcasting a
non-economic transaction.
|
