1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Return-Path: <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132C6C43
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:29:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com
[209.85.217.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B547170
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:29:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbcbn3 with SMTP id bn3so113410666lbc.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=WFatydTMzkhUCL9SLz6jiTd+yHbr2BcWr1NcMqHzMqw=;
b=F7zQc1JUtJJg14dyIuuWrlWk0mN7vHPNUV/k4o6APV0W5XVKgBRam4gmhOcuNznUS5
yk0+iJuHi5GhH6QeInOKfxRBoNC2ThGBlWVH+l0jkmJarnRxoM3Tn4qoI7QTVSrlg2q7
4BlluQA1dVu2zCPi1VsBhuDBW8LgAB7m4m+6ZPAZlBnYn3xqKt20zUyAz+XnfAsgv7iT
YJ4yG4NAC77XeQd1Xxnsw6BVnbG9Tb06/tSwwAcuM+kh++gF+cUxJfCofgByWZgwOP/X
ZVtRJBkxRgtjOS8wqajpsTbkwFW12epz8/kwbXdxWUqibEOlV7Tp0Vk1xX6UkgCV2lWF
82tw==
X-Received: by 10.152.21.231 with SMTP id y7mr26205120lae.63.1440570550718;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.22.25 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150826002958.GA10628@muck>
References: <CAED3CWipF8u5g3LUrqfyHxvEk4Lu+d12ZOJZnoBUw6iZZOg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzgq-x9GBbqARyhMgfSPc=wYeBgzXy4VUQ0D76GC+TCAxWDuA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150825201643.GC11083@muck> <1489961.GhSFCGzPRJ@crushinator>
<20150825203744.GB3464@muck> <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
<CAFzgq-zwkJ2QnnpFsf6X7L00k=+b4s--1POq_=T7j=v-+e1FTg@mail.gmail.com>
<20150826002958.GA10628@muck>
From: Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAO2FKHUL9wSNsSX-BgVfiPU++CjHAwYnFrgu5LGvdS8-hvaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, greg@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
[BIP 1xx - Draft]
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:29:16 -0000
On 26 August 2015 at 01:29, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> For instance, a very simple toy example that would work is just XORing your vote with SHA256(the entire blockchain)
Uh, that would totally not work.
I think my proposal of using CLTV to lock coins (votes) is better.
Failing a soft-fork to implement that in time, counting votes from the
UTXO set is also ok - the difference between that and CLTV is that it
is not as strong an evidence of commitment.
|
