summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f9/0b3e4f451c66b4398c55610e25a030aa944940
blob: 5cb4d9504f0da7057ace26d3b378df0ae5265a31 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
Return-Path: <alex.schoof@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D100C001E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471E84CCF
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ja_8ZTgmiKu2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:54:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1310484CCC
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:54:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id g11so22897441lfu.2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:54:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=XjS7Te3uPYLhWEedyJy5Q6IHO1qJSNTuFAJyZNI/HJs=;
 b=DkBq6yCvmbUZm4Soy3j705fwUmIfIL+RVUoiT5wqWiPMoa9DvFMWaj3kT4XLshc/SA
 5hCZpWJqZRxpeMJpP/0RNTL+N71jRmwqB1fW6CFAIlZEr6KxhHk05P81F8KExavXqH4w
 G/jDTOuITSpl3V3EkN6a4Adx1eH6LO8OA7EcKZHdtYQ4l4OYT+yREWNpV1SmsRQROI/4
 ItBsDqFDTL5Zj1sHXJiE9afQYh5F09XbApzqk9w5LhyJ4cH/EC3J63HiBdZc969tXWTM
 yRg0SxSB6hm0dvBFouZNhdpkMdtj+3Idmfg8T0khi3r8zl6V79lyDpoJRYLB7aXlMbR6
 N0Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=XjS7Te3uPYLhWEedyJy5Q6IHO1qJSNTuFAJyZNI/HJs=;
 b=6A8kzz+GHmF6aNxdGP7v3VRymQo3LhfHlxoZfoTIko7r594koqFN9XdguuFyjPiY2z
 +/o0XMvdt/udN+djqjCGIOJr8+GTyjFmaXBV9puComzg9ToOvSVeZ1K/ZgJJMwJfpqrH
 m7Kh6ug+wCwnvHYz7m1BEyW4wj8DccGBUxrHjMA6NT5RaDb1KeVMz2YlgyMtmvr7w6WV
 RdEbJSkP4QgD3JiUjuAA2BrLjssaZzCuX5kRLjXtS8H3PFLHknNgXn3k2dwEfSVfG87J
 1qZ7vHtZLxKVVLJadUO/DHgc1Wy1ZexN3pIkHiKY6YRk9ObTcVryU0puPZ5uT2pEU1EG
 YPyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DXflZfyVcRXpuPXe2uWjCkHguvbh9mYtXLKyBwk2MEKufIXqF
 rr4dpX/9XChovKGlHTvigf/yyMCwFGCLAgo3gT4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBM33g18Y2TtTf4VEEZCAPTxi40nzTIqMEgeALSHgel4TDx4yfZGv1Kgg32Qv2kc/fAA9/QHpKMlbL3+eC2+U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9011:: with SMTP id h17mr4099328ljg.528.1642100087859; 
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:54:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MtHvJYE--J-2@tutanota.de>
 <CABu3BAdUhFeCYtbs4HCV+c5rhurLYbf8tebX1UgZp+DathwxDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABu3BAdUhFeCYtbs4HCV+c5rhurLYbf8tebX1UgZp+DathwxDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Schoof <alex.schoof@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:54:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+2b5C0wJuWvsdz1pTcJ_-+GnkAXyOCUVimVeDjLu8f1PhYu0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Lee <steven.j.lee@gmail.com>, 
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c2ea105d57b38f6"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:11:59 +0000
Cc: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>, info@bitcoindefensefund.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:54:51 -0000

--0000000000006c2ea105d57b38f6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> I also don't see why Alex or anyone should be denied the opportunity to
comment on future soft forks or anything about bitcoin. Alex should have no
more or less right to participate and his comments should be judged on
their merit, just like yours and mine.

I think the concern is something like: "I disagree with a board member of
the defense fund about [insert contentious issue]. If I disagree with them
publicly (especially if there are clear economic implications in that
disagreement), am I putting myself at risk in the future where I won't be
able to get support from the fund because I spoke out against a board
member?" That kind of concern can be mitigated through policy and
governance, but is the kind of thing you want to tackle before it becomes
an issue.

Cheers,

(a different) Alex

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:49 PM Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I think the word "The" is important. The title of the email and the name
> of the fund is Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. It is "a" legal defense fund;
> not THE Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. There is room for other funds and
> strategies and anyone is welcome to create alternatives.
>
> I also don't see why Alex or anyone should be denied the opportunity to
> comment on future soft forks or anything about bitcoin. Alex should have no
> more or less right to participate and his comments should be judged on
> their merit, just like yours and mine.
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:37 AM Prayank via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>>
>> > The main purpose of this Fund is to defend developers from lawsuits
>> regarding their activities in the Bitcoin ecosystem, including finding and
>> retaining defense counsel, developing litigation strategy, and paying legal
>> bills. This is a free and voluntary option for developers to take advantage
>> of if they so wish. The Fund will start with a corps of volunteer and
>> part-time lawyers. The board of the Fund will be responsible for
>> determining which lawsuits and defendants it will help defend.
>>
>> Thanks for helping the developers in legal issues. Appreciate your
>> efforts and I understand your intentions are to help Bitcoin in every
>> possible way.
>>
>>
>> Positives that I see in this initiative:
>>
>> 1.Developers don't need to worry about rich scammers and can focus on
>> development.
>>
>> 2.Financial help for developers as legal issues can end up in wasting lot
>> of time and money.
>>
>> 3.People who have misused courts to affect bitcoin developers will get
>> better response that they deserve.
>>
>>
>> I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make
>> sense:
>>
>> 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense
>> Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official
>> in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some
>> of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
>>
>> 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not
>> comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had
>> some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prayank
>>
>> A3B1 E430 2298 178F
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>


-- 


Alex Schoof

--0000000000006c2ea105d57b38f6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">&gt;=C2=A0I also don&#39;t see why Alex or anyone should b=
e denied the opportunity to comment on future soft forks or anything about =
bitcoin. Alex should have no more or less right to participate and his comm=
ents should=C2=A0be judged on their merit, just like yours and mine.<div><b=
r></div><div>I think the concern is something like: &quot;I disagree with a=
 board member of the defense fund about [insert contentious issue]. If I di=
sagree with them publicly (especially if there are clear economic implicati=
ons in that disagreement), am I putting myself at risk in the future where =
I won&#39;t be able to get support from the fund because I spoke out agains=
t a board member?&quot; That kind of concern can be mitigated through polic=
y and governance, but is the kind of thing you want to tackle before it bec=
omes an issue.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>(a=
 different) Alex</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
 class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:49 PM Steve Lee via bitcoin=
-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-d=
ev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-=
left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div =
dir=3D"ltr">I think the word &quot;The&quot; is important. The title of the=
 email and the name of the fund is Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. It is &quot;=
a&quot; legal defense fund; not THE Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund. There is ro=
om for other funds and strategies and anyone is welcome to create alternati=
ves.<div><br></div><div>I also don&#39;t see why Alex or anyone should be d=
enied the opportunity to comment on future soft forks or anything about bit=
coin. Alex should have no more or less right to participate and his comment=
s should=C2=A0be judged on their merit, just like yours and mine.</div></di=
v><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On T=
hu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:37 AM Prayank via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.l=
inuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote=
" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style=
:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div>
<div>Hi Jack,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto">&gt;=C2=A0The main purpose of this Fund is to defend =
developers from lawsuits regarding their activities in the Bitcoin ecosyste=
m, including finding and retaining defense counsel, developing litigation s=
trategy, and paying legal bills. This is a free and voluntary option for de=
velopers to take advantage of if they so wish. The Fund will start with a c=
orps of volunteer and part-time lawyers. The board of the Fund will be resp=
onsible for determining which lawsuits and defendants it will help defend.<=
br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks for helping t=
he developers in legal issues. Appreciate your efforts and I understand you=
r intentions are to help Bitcoin in every possible way.<br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Positives=
 that I see in this initiative:<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto">1.Developers don&#39;t need to worry about rich scammers and ca=
n focus on development.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"au=
to">2.Financial help for developers as legal issues can end up in wasting l=
ot of time and money.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto=
">3.People who have misused courts to affect bitcoin developers will get be=
tter response that they deserve.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div =
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I had few suggestions and feel fre=
e to ignore them if they do not make sense:<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br>=
</div><div dir=3D"auto">1.Name of this fund could be anything and &#39;The =
Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund&#39; can be confusing or misleading for newbies.=
 There is nothing official in Bitcoin however people believe things written=
 in news articles and some of them might consider it as an official bitcoin=
 legal fund.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">2.It wo=
uld be better if people involved in such important funds do not comment/inf=
luence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had some opinion=
s about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.<br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <b=
r></div><div>Prayank<br></div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">A3B1 E430 22=
98 178F<br></div>  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr"=
 class=3D"gmail_signature"><br><br>Alex Schoof</div>

--0000000000006c2ea105d57b38f6--