1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <sipa@ulyssis.org>) id 1QekHQ-0003Y2-3U
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:49:52 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129]
helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be)
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1QekHO-0002oe-Ow for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:49:52 +0000
X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: sipa@ulyssis.org
X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-48.798, required 5,
autolearn=disabled, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.00,
FREEMAIL_FROM 0.00, KUL_SMTPS -50.00, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 1.20)
X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean
X-KULeuven-ID: 723B613831B.A64A3
X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be
[134.58.240.75])
by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B613831B
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:49:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ulyssis.org (mail.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.be
[193.190.253.235])
by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EFBF3862
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:49:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wop.ulyssis.org (wop.intern.ulyssis.org [192.168.0.182])
by smtp.ulyssis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674C710067
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:50:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wop.ulyssis.org (Postfix, from userid 615)
id 5225187C1A5; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:49:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:49:39 +0200
X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <20110707084937.GA10392@ulyssis.org>
References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
<20110703104415.GA2034@ulyssis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110703104415.GA2034@ulyssis.org>
X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit,
and not from a mailing list
X-Headers-End: 1QekHO-0002oe-Ow
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:49:52 -0000
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:44:17PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> I have no preference for any particular project build system. If a system
> * is easy enough to set up (included in standard repositories, eg.)
> * allows building of the bitcoin codebase on several linux distro's
> * does cross-compilation to windows
> * supports osx
> * is easy to maintain
> * it is not too hard to adapt other GUI's to use it (bitcoin-qt,
> maybe others as well, i hear about a cocoabitcoin?)
> * gets implemented and tested to support all of the above
> .. i have no problem with choosing that system for future versions.
Other opinions? Someone actually interested in writing a cmake configuration
for bitcoin?
--
Pieter
|
