1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60516B44
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 3 May 2017 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f169.google.com (mail-ua0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4CDFE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 3 May 2017 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e55so1753188uaa.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 03 May 2017 14:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=TeCPEwhQwm1XYtNJDmIx6xavthD0NUbEkg8X1mVSWc0=;
b=KrWG7Epm01SkZjDJ3lTcAzLHMskvRALN600pKqPe/E6FPC80/nuVOqu3ECiAOXNOfj
3QPaK6PljWajqG1gLA37+fqYl5m4mPmHsZKud5mDCR+p3f+wPXTAnBXEt09I1tCptYeJ
sdqn4qrUrT3lbZRdt6FxW6/MLSVXA9K6KFBlUSjhWfbZlBvvgBWbnc9K3itIgRfVD9HN
pSuRVCvG0HWx4kmCUmjmrA6CD7dO3vgjMiNdN4fbBbOXTeDygRVB36wE2XgPyutRLBXq
FhdFvIKBV7DUy9K8v8R6V5riZAsyKp6aHaqAwVnYe9D2VcJEjBerS9jNo341G2/691n1
lXog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=TeCPEwhQwm1XYtNJDmIx6xavthD0NUbEkg8X1mVSWc0=;
b=ZWW5dDCXnwx0vJjh88JcpdHv0u3ngo5SZNne2Un8nOJx41sACZUJcQ7vDDTL7mS7gx
su3ySsHmxouGdiEZOFZX5wdf895KNaSYCsY9l9DJYU4LS1TE37bub5WiK78J8Azrfi/P
OwiBjb7qcGQiR11gNqdcANYdpDZuwM1x8Afjz4f1ADpI9AJXLDHg77m0YzsSn8Bt5P6c
x2xQ7LHMOrq0Pug1cc0BdKbR/XQtmekR5Xpb4bXrr4yoo0pJHcco53ZLmeLC8Fr9Ttbk
4Ue/RQmu5nDj4l4OGeAnCEtzR2D8EOT9zNxe1EgOzPg5aumdC7seMHklnoAyhnYHvr7L
6zfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6iTJU2FHZLF8PQj0pXhyF3lb6WVu+FAiKd4UecG6WFgt3Wmj+/
AVOUJUw8wOIizD2l8tkTqcrfhQ4tYA==
X-Received: by 10.176.2.48 with SMTP id 45mr7690778uas.30.1493848387571; Wed,
03 May 2017 14:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.48.18 with HTTP; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKg+snAUjbCFkTybNqiJCy=d_M3s5k376y1B=rVqD8WCOXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJowKg+snAUjbCFkTybNqiJCy=d_M3s5k376y1B=rVqD8WCOXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:53:07 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5JGWMo9csdWflBynBQYirBvWwSc
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQYhi3oqncrNU+26E4JoHHfQMJAyTGtJY-ZD6J9O7NPsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Full node "tip" function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 21:53:09 -0000
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> CONS:
The primary result would be paying people to sybil attack the network.
It's far cheaper to run one node behind thousands of IPs than it is to
run many nodes.
Suggestions like this have come up many times before.
|
