summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f6/49e3d24938b3de5240ba4404b7f2e0193f7a0f
blob: 3964b116c5d85ddf937a4c66e6cfa5c52818d370 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
Return-Path: <tobypadilla@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 531381080
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  2 Feb 2016 17:41:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.213.50])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E5A61A0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  2 Feb 2016 17:41:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e64so103340191vkg.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:41:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=J+jX31bLJauPmALxew3gUieSMEx4fxzwKcMxBiXR+mE=;
	b=NOmfK7o+3uQxNu+JxfcEK1kwl6dtREn9vJtTNtMRVPX82ZQr99df4KXV7z1acDyJls
	nWCNbQRIlqxyOkUX14f81X1vAlbuootsYMV8xKw9AWh1hFSDMfCUff/s38w3PPxuOeDJ
	2VD/+qtOsrNjHJb6Y3gEB95KPsp4z45Y/SPPXmLwv0OtEfiBQD1TRUnetCgsKIWuYNWk
	t7tEHilNAu178ynfh2UUX7peqpukhP1qnwpqH5KQGLwGpBYve0/4i0IHF0MpeTSB3uSD
	J744xRo5VoyZt89JzXNYpXUqGRiLyWihXXplbB0OpO+y4hfTqccvQHLPi06G4i8tWMKD
	ZtFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=J+jX31bLJauPmALxew3gUieSMEx4fxzwKcMxBiXR+mE=;
	b=fEb3Oeeg/12H56kK9IMJleJs7uXvmcz1TBd5F1KLn9e2KFlEJXizszBd0T/0pcFC7U
	MMbcUwxDIiXq0lRVnGk9Op91rBN9HhSc8BRcWhO0HG34EwuvC+86pcfEDNLoyCp+P82v
	lZMjR7kkrUY7+0Hf5ozDzSmY3oJktx6CvaQIDKRVR/dJDghb8360QHSVX14DNfgHWTuR
	q6dfCS9igYmjIRr5I2xXSTOJVGtNH/Tdii1dYIc7/1vhjd6AbhHLAdeKk82XPlhi/X7m
	TfHnxp4ceSvjjG/gxKEd2dPnHwK7238RYkq4lfJ3BF2DtjksfVUUo88YAdjs/5SyhfPb
	7vWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORHvE+/cj3pqxxjltJ0BwNwjIArKazfrpPyxSzk+LKMSWameFNOFzv+5Es6U8H7lr+doyWMjofyQB0Hcw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.1.6 with SMTP id 6mr14337782vkb.139.1454434895238; Tue,
	02 Feb 2016 09:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.96.210 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:41:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160202173849.GA5096@muck>
References: <CAGcHOzzde_T3xJwJL2Ehyw7U1FgxEEBJR30VBLdSZMj=W49hSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201601260312.25248.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAGcHOzw88za1m6uJY9MBO2X=3psNk667FyBOHz2XCPO3ABbcRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201601260323.14993.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAGcHOzwec-eoG-uZzXY2pb=VzQ98EvnijvxrcsrFYgKi2HQ_uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<56A79C86.1030902@gmail.com>
	<CAGcHOzybd3fgmdZwdMjq36O4-dXUMcdpdV0+jovTSiAtzFdGUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160202170356.GC18604@muck>
	<CAPg+sBipDyJC7_UPE8p0oSxaHOC3m5aus562Mc_s=wBkeMh5HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGcHOzyScNoLT=rHY0BMZvCowYG_WyQ8u-xu=4vHE8xWHraAOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160202173849.GA5096@muck>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:41:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGcHOzx0_KwKBRgDPYOO1EpmqYwmnTfROKiEpTac48wadc6RWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Toby Padilla <tobypadilla@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dc466479c7a052acd0376
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:46:38 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Draft] Allow zero value OP_RETURN in Payment
	Protocol
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:41:37 -0000

--001a113dc466479c7a052acd0376
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Then the moderation is being unevenly applied. Luke commented against my
BIP multiple times right after it was published but it took hours for my
responses to go through and I had to track people down on IRC to ask about
it:

http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0800, Toby Padilla wrote:
> > The mailing list is a problem. I'm still on moderation only. I have no
> idea
> > if this message will go through and when it will go through. I totally
> > understand the desire to keep the conversation level high, but when
> people
> > who *are* whitelisted can quickly post multiple heated arguments against
> > you (publicly) and you can't respond, then that starts to look very
> > centralized and discouraging.
>
> Everyone is on moderation only in this mailing list, myself included.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698
>

--001a113dc466479c7a052acd0376
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Then the moderation is being unevenly applied. Luke commen=
ted against my BIP multiple times right after it was published but it took =
hours for my responses to go through and I had to track people down on IRC =
to ask about it:<div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation=
.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html">http://lists.linuxfoun=
dation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html</a><br></div></di=
v><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 2, =
2016 at 9:38 AM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pe=
tertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:=
27:58AM -0800, Toby Padilla wrote:<br>
&gt; The mailing list is a problem. I&#39;m still on moderation only. I hav=
e no idea<br>
&gt; if this message will go through and when it will go through. I totally=
<br>
&gt; understand the desire to keep the conversation level high, but when pe=
ople<br>
&gt; who *are* whitelisted can quickly post multiple heated arguments again=
st<br>
&gt; you (publicly) and you can&#39;t respond, then that starts to look ver=
y<br>
&gt; centralized and discouraging.<br>
<br>
</span>Everyone is on moderation only in this mailing list, myself included=
.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
--<br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http=
s://petertodd.org</a> &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org"=
 rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</a><br>
000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a113dc466479c7a052acd0376--