1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
Return-Path: <david.vorick@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0933BFD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:25:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wr0-f173.google.com (mail-wr0-f173.google.com
[209.85.128.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2EE176
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:25:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l43so23068578wre.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=SPOHB0LqjjHtyW6eeViil5qdigYpQhnO1y7LN+SXZhE=;
b=Aj9aA4rBGND/batyM5iwqkvzkSwnt+chIs+aUu6jLqVCBfdzA2aTzrhbXcGLFU9YUm
4Cm/KDMLf0P0aNMp7fQgrmdqs8HmXDHX0so/+P+jG0f0i1WmnEcCZBzZm5CLxpFTgPKc
vzl/ewUjtiyzAC3+sbHW8V8WqAWACsQsZOyD9OSbIfGqSNWOKhA/nudqxjgH/lu/5vKU
DBLWx0xNsnGWxYez2N5bW6dKivvQrNpfk+2lMs1b0p9O2u6JF+x+F0/AxE01zZ/Z9ORT
mIvuS53t5zXGwDU4/apQfVsWV7xsjCeqjqj6B3EBVr9+jjoQukT2kpf1pdChnBkkL9O2
twGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=SPOHB0LqjjHtyW6eeViil5qdigYpQhnO1y7LN+SXZhE=;
b=TZlW4S3UaEvinU00u1h2/Wza2XyB++icW/OsL/aruEq1eX+boSIvuWi65EwSBUTA0I
3NNNBp3nnCOkvVjgfY62THBHBMMYPyjmngUuD31pib585XIxFZTC2ZqMOej3YZok0T+v
guGH50SqU4PFAiOS9GqE/7LEFWy1L2LN4FubF5ruvhNIDvwdb4pmo0IRSIL8Zk+U1UMs
12TnIhq7dO3CaFLzHVsmQP0zDnRXamjpg1huKBDtTICrKCK8TVF+xvDYWvKD6PtQKcem
Kup5OsBhRdE1hEHcoFfHW8HkoxnZqeUBtG83SyWMHcr+DZVEY6lKEnQnY24dyFrPHKaq
wpjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Dn1yGiiQE/Mlt2pW6t5EXmExzzPM9zFCF/lDFAiDch0P4SWmNqnv+vIYFWFA9o36FklUKUZqapVNwBg==
X-Received: by 10.223.148.102 with SMTP id 93mr1215015wrq.144.1490804748642;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.55.9 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.55.9 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAy62_J+huc_d5r-gyYCMGh6AjfJH4YiEVov9eBmwbKbWTe0Sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFzgq-xizPMNqfvW11nUhd6HmfZu8aGjcR9fshEsf6o5HOt_dA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB-xxiPV9oN1r2hV5a=U1pcYuiZ_qmth-AM-H+1Cjgc2uw-0xA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFVRnyr=cYf34X80+dLHwYEPHdqA7mMtYZ_gD6j09C+aM31gQQ@mail.gmail.com>
<f61153c3-9afb-5cee-2c6b-70d67208f015@gmail.com>
<CAFVRnyo1XGNbq_F8UfqqJWHCVH14iMCUMU-R5bOh+h3mtwSUJg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFVRnyqxQhu0c-ACfzR5=Z=C1SbR70jrfCaCeEdfSJASSnzpqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAy62_J+huc_d5r-gyYCMGh6AjfJH4YiEVov9eBmwbKbWTe0Sw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Vorick <david.vorick@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:25:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFVRnyrpfRUVNWjR19+ou7PxQuLbaoY8yta+BAAK3zbMrdsOhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Johnson <andrew.johnson83@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0d2574790d51054be107b8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:25:50 -0000
--94eb2c0d2574790d51054be107b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mar 29, 2017 12:20 PM, "Andrew Johnson" <andrew.johnson83@gmail.com>
wrote:
What's stopping these users from running a pruned node? Not every node
needs to store a complete copy of the blockchain.
Pruned nodes are not the default configuration, if it was the default
configuration then I think you would see far more users running a pruned
node.
But that would also substantially increase the burden on archive nodes.
Further discussion about disk space requirements should be taken to another
thread.
--94eb2c0d2574790d51054be107b8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extr=
a"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mar 29, 2017 12:20 PM, "Andrew Johnso=
n" <<a href=3D"mailto:andrew.johnson83@gmail.com">andrew.johnson83@=
gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"quote=
" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><=
div>What's stopping these users from running a pruned node?=C2=A0 Not e=
very node needs to store a complete copy of the blockchain.=C2=A0</div></bl=
ockquote></div></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"qu=
ote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex=
"><div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=
=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Pruned nodes are not the default configuration,=
if it was the default configuration then I think you would see far more us=
ers running a pruned node.</span><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:san=
s-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">But t=
hat would also substantially increase the burden on archive nodes.</div><br=
></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Further=
discussion about disk space requirements should be taken to another thread=
.</span><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><br></div></blockquote></div=
></div></div></div>
--94eb2c0d2574790d51054be107b8--
|
