1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53007F0C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D3013B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:19:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2B3938A916A;
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:17:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::NTUyU1j02aiMKMS4:aH8I2
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:stephen@bitpay.com::Fb7b9UxHdfZcgf7w:b4Hzu
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:gavinandresen@gmail.com::FgLx8F5JAwdgVFRY:alGXT
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:genjix@riseup.net::NhIJ2nuw6fIHeBG2:aQuTs
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:hearn@vinumeris.com::DJeS6mzbu9fWwXUw:bFJcU
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160208:pieter.wuille@gmail.com::HcvMDRIO1+g7IGrO:cnkfo
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Pair <stephen@bitpay.com>,
Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>, Amir Taaki <genjix@riseup.net>,
Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:17:55 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.13-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201602082217.57146.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SBL,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:19:44 -0000
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/314 proposes updating the status of many
Accepted BIPs to Final:
BIP 11: M-of-N Standard Transactions
BIP 14: Protocol Version and User Agent
BIP 21: URI Scheme
BIP 22: getblocktemplate - Fundamentals
BIP 23: getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining
BIP 31: Pong message
BIP 32: Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets
BIP 34: Block v2, Height in Coinbase
BIP 35: mempool message
BIP 37: Connection Bloom filtering
BIP 65: OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
This PR has been open for a week, and I plan to merge it within the next week
unless there are objections.
Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrade
five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs from the
champions of the BIPs:
BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
BIP 60: Fixed Length "version" Message (Relay-Transactions Field), by Amir
Taaki
BIP 64: getutxo message, by Mike Hearn
BIP 66: Strict DER signatures, by Pieter Wuille
BIP 73: Use "Accept" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request
URLs, by Stephen Pair
Thanks,
Luke
|
