summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f1/2a5360bf26c49cbb44a74e8371569595fd5756
blob: 85070c21f956a6de27d3f658f06d9b0643eb2b9c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
Return-Path: <laolu32@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4F1A67
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2017 03:59:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yb0-f181.google.com (mail-yb0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.213.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282A4E5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2017 03:59:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 4so13456328ybl.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=D5NMO7bM/slFvtGnCF1TNfV/R+Mz/w49XnHYILWG5l0=;
	b=NG8Bef86FK7a6koD4on+jvtmV1lN2bTNPPiUUN/+1dFgUn6u0beMAHdRRWIKc6qJll
	vJr7BI1PpRwqDcFtLhAHnYRR5kdv5mmFeu01FPwwC2lFJ6MYWQBsTXoG2Pm3rrrpzysp
	ABZ6UOyKUV/EM3LTrK+rvRglPkiiNyEPNiWN/VV35oSf9qtZByzK8FnGvMjRnLw5eVwW
	eIs0fezvdYyAMPTJ6RRB8CIC3cXUePy027s/hmIk+xZSIIcvvRodbmoeJZaY1BSTALT7
	lGwlaGpelUu3zVwlUXxfZaK2g7/DNi9QKnYLGG5AvRMQLvvbNV1nlwcNRfZpCK7F1MQy
	PRsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=D5NMO7bM/slFvtGnCF1TNfV/R+Mz/w49XnHYILWG5l0=;
	b=EGcSmaNwfNeV8mkP4aktQwmf/Gt2qnvGPXlAtfFH3LI1kqAxxsxXWC+UXLlm/61hez
	Ie/EihNKhx8xDXB5v5J8+dzIB/0T3eK1QDtoW2FwwI4pcfPmkd7MAp3dOCjl4H3eYdGB
	NItXlGz6conzJuWKfpewEF2RSr3/JNhF2a1N/n7lTV1Uk5/gLE5eclRuFSuxYvD3XgJj
	CNdill8huD02PULGKdp/8TqDtqG+kXxLNgAN1nlQLS0YgH6cKjfB5GLhu6fVP6SjTi3l
	mH752jTAXX363SNnzFmOf8n87l0946k0E226MFSwyFdvmd7g+roViXOWLJ//RIav9BcP
	bk1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDeiNpJthAkmPyHxLEkqHTBsyWcGcYjGLaqsUHZIz5XaNrfpoEL
	P659JJt6dg5iCbb7w+a/ttgu9/AN3fG8
X-Received: by 10.37.128.131 with SMTP id n3mr13560280ybk.30.1496980768076;
	Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO3Pvs8ccTkgrecJG6KFbBW+9moHF-FTU+4qNfayeE3hM9uRrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO3Pvs-nNQR_53_wjS4rPU8W20kePnrSdBvCXMwpaOG7gpUNJQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO3Pvs-nNQR_53_wjS4rPU8W20kePnrSdBvCXMwpaOG7gpUNJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:59:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO3Pvs8-GAwUNZ9Fc7DAb9ZCwP4p5Wh0sD1O0n5NSLVcY2nJtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0822ef74eabbc705517efe44"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Compact Client Side Filtering for
	Light Clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:59:30 -0000

--089e0822ef74eabbc705517efe44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi y'all,

Thanks for all the comments so far!

I've pushed a series of updates to the text of the BIP repo linked in the
OP.
The fixes include: typos, components of the specification which were
incorrect
(N is the total number of items, NOT the number of txns in the block), and a
few sections have been clarified.

The latest version also includes a set of test vectors (as CSV files), which
for a series of fp rates (1/2 to 1/2^32) includes (for 6 testnet blocks,
one of
which generates a "null" filter):

   * The block height
   * The block hash
   * The raw block itself
   * The previous basic+extended filter header
   * The basic+extended filter header for the block
   * The basic+extended filter for the block

The size of the test vectors was too large to include in-line within the
document, so we put them temporarily in a distinct folder [1]. The code
used to
generate the test vectors has also been included.

-- Laolu

[1]: https://github.com/Roasbeef/bips/tree/master/gcs_light_client


On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:49 PM Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32@gmail.com> wrote:

> > In order to consider the average+median filter sizes in a world worth
> larger
> > blocks, I also ran the index for testnet:
> >
> >     * total size:  2753238530
> >     * total avg:  5918.95736054141
> >     * total median:  60202
> >     * total max:  74983
> >     * regular size:  1165148878
> >     * regular avg:  2504.856172982827
> >     * regular median:  24812
> >     * regular max:  64554
> >     * extended size:  1588089652
> >     * extended avg:  3414.1011875585823
> >     * extended median:  35260
> >     * extended max:  41731
> >
>
> Oops, realized I made a mistake. These are the stats for Feb 2016 until
> about a
> month ago (since height 400k iirc).
>
> -- Laolu
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:01 PM Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi y'all,
>>
>> Alex Akselrod and I would like to propose a new light client BIP for
>> consideration:
>>    *
>> https://github.com/Roasbeef/bips/blob/master/gcs_light_client.mediawiki
>>
>> This BIP proposal describes a concrete specification (along with a
>> reference implementations[1][2][3]) for the much discussed client-side
>> filtering reversal of BIP-37. The precise details are described in the
>> BIP, but as a summary: we've implemented a new light-client mode that uses
>> client-side filtering based off of Golomb-Rice coded sets. Full-nodes
>> maintain an additional index of the chain, and serve this compact filter
>> (the index) to light clients which request them. Light clients then fetch
>> these filters, query the locally and _maybe_ fetch the block if a relevant
>> item matches. The cool part is that blocks can be fetched from _any_
>> source, once the light client deems it necessary. Our primary motivation
>> for this work was enabling a light client mode for lnd[4] in order to
>> support a more light-weight back end paving the way for the usage of
>> Lightning on mobile phones and other devices. We've integrated neutrino
>> as a back end for lnd, and will be making the updated code public very
>> soon.
>>
>> One specific area we'd like feedback on is the parameter selection. Unlike
>> BIP-37 which allows clients to dynamically tune their false positive rate,
>> our proposal uses a _fixed_ false-positive. Within the document, it's
>> currently specified as P = 1/2^20. We've done a bit of analysis and
>> optimization attempting to optimize the following sum:
>> filter_download_bandwidth + expected_block_false_positive_bandwidth. Alex
>> has made a JS calculator that allows y'all to explore the affect of
>> tweaking the false positive rate in addition to the following variables:
>> the number of items the wallet is scanning for, the size of the blocks,
>> number of blocks fetched, and the size of the filters themselves. The
>> calculator calculates the expected bandwidth utilization using the CDF of
>> the Geometric Distribution. The calculator can be found here:
>> https://aakselrod.github.io/gcs_calc.html. Alex also has an empirical
>> script he's been running on actual data, and the results seem to match up
>> rather nicely.
>>
>> We we're excited to see that Karl Johan Alm (kallewoof) has done some
>> (rather extensive!) analysis of his own, focusing on a distinct encoding
>> type [5]. I haven't had the time yet to dig into his report yet, but I
>> think I've read enough to extract the key difference in our encodings: his
>> filters use a binomial encoding _directly_ on the filter contents, will we
>> instead create a Golomb-Coded set with the contents being _hashes_ (we use
>> siphash) of the filter items.
>>
>> Using a fixed fp=20, I have some stats detailing the total index size, as
>> well as averages for both mainnet and testnet. For mainnet, using the
>> filter contents as currently described in the BIP (basic + extended), the
>> total size of the index comes out to 6.9GB. The break down is as follows:
>>
>>     * total size:  6976047156
>>     * total avg:  14997.220622758816
>>     * total median:  3801
>>     * total max:  79155
>>     * regular size:  3117183743
>>     * regular avg:  6701.372750217131
>>     * regular median:  1734
>>     * regular max:  67533
>>     * extended size:  3858863413 <(385)%20886-3413>
>>     * extended avg:  8295.847872541684
>>     * extended median:  2041
>>     * extended max:  52508
>>
>> In order to consider the average+median filter sizes in a world worth
>> larger blocks, I also ran the index for testnet:
>>
>>     * total size:  2753238530
>>     * total avg:  5918.95736054141
>>     * total median:  60202
>>     * total max:  74983
>>     * regular size:  1165148878
>>     * regular avg:  2504.856172982827
>>     * regular median:  24812
>>     * regular max:  64554
>>     * extended size:  1588089652
>>     * extended avg:  3414.1011875585823
>>     * extended median:  35260
>>     * extended max:  41731
>>
>> Finally, here are the testnet stats which take into account the increase
>> in the maximum filter size due to segwit's block-size increase. The max
>> filter sizes are a bit larger due to some of the habitual blocks I
>> created last year when testing segwit (transactions with 30k inputs, 30k
>> outputs, etc).
>>
>>      * total size:  585087597
>>      * total avg:  520.8839608674402
>>      * total median:  20
>>      * total max:  164598
>>      * regular size:  299325029
>>      * regular avg:  266.4790836307566
>>      * regular median:  13
>>      * regular max:  164583
>>      * extended size:  285762568
>>      * extended avg:  254.4048772366836
>>      * extended median:  7
>>      * extended max:  127631
>>
>> For those that are interested in the raw data, I've uploaded a CSV file
>> of raw data for each block (mainnet + testnet), which can be found here:
>>      * mainnet: (14MB):
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/4yk2u8dj06njbuv/mainnet-gcs-stats.csv?dl=0
>>      * testnet: (25MB):
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/w7dmmcbocnmjfbo/gcs-stats-testnet.csv?dl=0
>>
>>
>> We look forward to getting feedback from all of y'all!
>>
>> -- Laolu
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/lightninglabs/neutrino
>> [2]: https://github.com/Roasbeef/btcd/tree/segwit-cbf
>> [3]: https://github.com/Roasbeef/btcutil/tree/gcs/gcs
>> [4]: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/
>>
>> -- Laolu
>>
>>

--089e0822ef74eabbc705517efe44
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hi y&#39;all,=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Tha=
nks for all the comments so far!</div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve pushed a=
 series of updates to the text of the BIP repo linked in the OP.</div><div>=
The fixes include: typos, components of the specification which were incorr=
ect</div><div>(N is the total number of items, NOT the number of txns in th=
e block), and a</div><div>few sections have been clarified.</div><div><br><=
/div><div>The latest version also includes a set of test vectors (as CSV fi=
les), which</div><div>for a series of fp rates (1/2 to 1/2^32) includes (fo=
r 6 testnet blocks, one of</div><div>which generates a &quot;null&quot; fil=
ter):=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The block height</div><=
div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The block hash</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The raw block it=
self</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The previous basic+extended filter header=C2=
=A0</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The basic+extended filter header for the block=
</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* The basic+extended filter for the block</div><div=
><br></div><div>The size of the test vectors was too large to include in-li=
ne within the</div><div>document, so we put them temporarily in a distinct =
folder [1]. The code used to</div><div>generate the test vectors has also b=
een included.</div><div><br></div><div>-- Laolu</div><div><br></div><div>[1=
]: <a href=3D"https://github.com/Roasbeef/bips/tree/master/gcs_light_client=
">https://github.com/Roasbeef/bips/tree/master/gcs_light_client</a></div><d=
iv><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Jun 1,=
 2017 at 9:49 PM Olaoluwa Osuntokun &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:laolu32@gmail.com=
">laolu32@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>&gt; In order to consider the average+median filter s=
izes in a world worth larger</div><div>&gt; blocks, I also ran the index fo=
r testnet:</div><div>&gt;=C2=A0</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total size: =
=C2=A02753238530</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total avg: =C2=A05918.95736=
054141</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total median: =C2=A060202</div><div>&=
gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total max: =C2=A074983</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * r=
egular size: =C2=A01165148878</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular avg: =
=C2=A02504.856172982827</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular median: =C2=
=A024812</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular max: =C2=A064554</div><div>=
&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended size: =C2=A01588089652</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 * extended avg: =C2=A03414.1011875585823</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 * extended median: =C2=A035260</div><div>&gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended =
max: =C2=A041731</div><div>&gt;=C2=A0</div><div><br></div></div><div dir=3D=
"ltr"><div>Oops, realized I made a mistake. These are the stats for Feb 201=
6 until about a</div><div>month ago (since height 400k iirc).</div><div><br=
></div><div>-- Laolu</div></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br></div><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:01 PM Olaolu=
wa Osuntokun &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:laolu32@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">lao=
lu32@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div =
dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi y&#39;all,=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Alex Akselrod=
 and I would like to propose a new light client BIP for</div><div>considera=
tion:=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* <a href=3D"https://github.com/Roasbeef=
/bips/blob/master/gcs_light_client.mediawiki" target=3D"_blank">https://git=
hub.com/Roasbeef/bips/blob/master/gcs_light_client.mediawiki</a></div><div>=
<br></div><div>This BIP proposal describes a concrete specification (along =
with a</div><div>reference implementations[1][2][3]) for the much discussed=
 client-side</div><div>filtering reversal of BIP-37. The precise details ar=
e described in the</div><div>BIP, but as a summary: we&#39;ve implemented a=
 new light-client mode that uses</div><div>client-side filtering based off =
of Golomb-Rice coded sets. Full-nodes</div><div>maintain an additional inde=
x of the chain, and serve this compact filter</div><div>(the index) to ligh=
t clients which request them. Light clients then fetch</div><div>these filt=
ers, query the locally and _maybe_ fetch the block if a relevant</div><div>=
item matches. The cool part is that blocks can be fetched from _any_</div><=
div>source, once the light client deems it necessary. Our primary motivatio=
n</div><div>for this work was enabling a light client mode for lnd[4] in or=
der to</div><div>support a more light-weight back end paving the way for th=
e usage of</div><div>Lightning on mobile phones and other devices. We&#39;v=
e integrated neutrino</div><div>as a back end for lnd, and will be making t=
he updated code public very</div><div>soon.</div><div><br></div><div>One sp=
ecific area we&#39;d like feedback on is the parameter selection. Unlike</d=
iv><div>BIP-37 which allows clients to dynamically tune their false positiv=
e rate,</div><div>our proposal uses a _fixed_ false-positive. Within the do=
cument, it&#39;s</div><div>currently specified as P =3D 1/2^20. We&#39;ve d=
one a bit of analysis and</div><div>optimization attempting to optimize the=
 following sum:</div><div>filter_download_bandwidth + expected_block_false_=
positive_bandwidth. Alex</div><div>has made a JS calculator that allows y&#=
39;all to explore the affect of</div><div>tweaking the false positive rate =
in addition to the following variables:</div><div>the number of items the w=
allet is scanning for, the size of the blocks,</div><div>number of blocks f=
etched, and the size of the filters themselves. The</div><div>calculator ca=
lculates the expected bandwidth utilization using the CDF of</div><div>the =
Geometric Distribution. The calculator can be found here:</div><div><a href=
=3D"https://aakselrod.github.io/gcs_calc.html" target=3D"_blank">https://aa=
kselrod.github.io/gcs_calc.html</a>. Alex also has an empirical</div><div>s=
cript he&#39;s been running on actual data, and the results seem to match u=
p</div><div>rather nicely.</div><div><br></div><div>We we&#39;re excited to=
 see that Karl Johan Alm (kallewoof) has done some</div><div>(rather extens=
ive!) analysis of his own, focusing on a distinct encoding</div><div>type [=
5]. I haven&#39;t had the time yet to dig into his report yet, but I</div><=
div>think I&#39;ve read enough to extract the key difference in our encodin=
gs: his</div><div>filters use a binomial encoding _directly_ on the filter =
contents, will we</div><div>instead create a Golomb-Coded set with the cont=
ents being _hashes_ (we use</div><div>siphash) of the filter items.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>Using a fixed fp=3D20, I have some stats detailing the to=
tal index size, as</div><div>well as averages for both mainnet and testnet.=
 For mainnet, using the</div><div>filter contents as currently described in=
 the BIP (basic + extended), the</div><div>total size of the index comes ou=
t to 6.9GB. The break down is as follows:</div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 * total size: =C2=A06976047156</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total avg: =
=C2=A014997.220622758816</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total median: =C2=A03801=
</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total max: =C2=A079155</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 *=
 regular size: =C2=A03117183743</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular avg: =C2=
=A06701.372750217131</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular median: =C2=A01734</=
div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular max: =C2=A067533</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 *=
 extended size: =C2=A0<a href=3D"tel:(385)%20886-3413" value=3D"+1385886341=
3" target=3D"_blank">3858863413</a></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended avg:=
 =C2=A08295.847872541684</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended median: =C2=A02=
041</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended max: =C2=A052508</div><div><br></div=
><div>In order to consider the average+median filter sizes in a world worth=
</div><div>larger blocks, I also ran the index for testnet:=C2=A0</div><div=
><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total size: =C2=A02753238530</div><div>=C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 * total avg: =C2=A05918.95736054141</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * to=
tal median: =C2=A060202</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * total max: =C2=A074983</d=
iv><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular size: =C2=A01165148878</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 * regular avg: =C2=A02504.856172982827</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regula=
r median: =C2=A024812</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * regular max: =C2=A064554</d=
iv><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended size: =C2=A01588089652</div><div>=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 * extended avg: =C2=A03414.1011875585823</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * e=
xtended median: =C2=A035260</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 * extended max: =C2=A04=
1731</div><div><br></div><div>Finally, here are the testnet stats which tak=
e into account the increase</div><div>in the maximum filter size due to seg=
wit&#39;s block-size increase. The max</div><div>filter sizes are a bit lar=
ger due to some of the habitual blocks I</div><div>created last year when t=
esting segwit (transactions with 30k inputs, 30k</div><div>outputs, etc).</=
div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* total size: =C2=A0585087597</=
div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* total avg: =C2=A0520.8839608674402</div><div=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* total median: =C2=A020</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0* total max: =C2=A0164598</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* regular size: =
=C2=A0299325029</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* regular avg: =C2=A0266.4790=
836307566</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* regular median: =C2=A013</div><di=
v>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* regular max: =C2=A0164583</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0* extended size: =C2=A0285762568</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* exte=
nded avg: =C2=A0254.4048772366836</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* extended =
median: =C2=A07</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* extended max: =C2=A0127631<=
/div><div><br></div><div>For those that are interested in the raw data, I&#=
39;ve uploaded a CSV file</div><div>of raw data for each block (mainnet + t=
estnet), which can be found here:</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* mainnet: =
(14MB): <a href=3D"https://www.dropbox.com/s/4yk2u8dj06njbuv/mainnet-gcs-st=
ats.csv?dl=3D0" target=3D"_blank">https://www.dropbox.com/s/4yk2u8dj06njbuv=
/mainnet-gcs-stats.csv?dl=3D0</a></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0* testnet: =
(25MB): <a href=3D"https://www.dropbox.com/s/w7dmmcbocnmjfbo/gcs-stats-test=
net.csv?dl=3D0" target=3D"_blank">https://www.dropbox.com/s/w7dmmcbocnmjfbo=
/gcs-stats-testnet.csv?dl=3D0</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>W=
e look forward to getting feedback from all of y&#39;all!</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>-- Laolu</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>[1]: <a href=3D"ht=
tps://github.com/lightninglabs/neutrino" target=3D"_blank">https://github.c=
om/lightninglabs/neutrino</a></div><div>[2]: <a href=3D"https://github.com/=
Roasbeef/btcd/tree/segwit-cbf" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/Roasbee=
f/btcd/tree/segwit-cbf</a></div><div>[3]: <a href=3D"https://github.com/Roa=
sbeef/btcutil/tree/gcs/gcs" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/Roasbeef/b=
tcutil/tree/gcs/gcs</a></div><div>[4]: <a href=3D"https://github.com/lightn=
ingnetwork/lnd/" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/=
</a></div><div><br></div><div>-- Laolu</div><div><br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>

--089e0822ef74eabbc705517efe44--