1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Rmhft-0005td-Oz
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:12:17 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Rmhfq-00041c-Sn
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:12:17 +0000
Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so878804vcb.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:12:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.22.193 with SMTP id g1mr5154277vdf.77.1326701529420; Mon,
16 Jan 2012 00:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.182.137 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:12:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJA6vq=9FQw4aHYv0x9xY2E1nenMjzL+vgwCxFWcJM8dZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1326665394.7032.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CA+8xBpfWvLGtF3aP10xjTs-wyD1ia=iKLh3b=B+LqQjpRV5PVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<201201152019.36066.luke@dashjr.org>
<CA+s+GJA6vq=9FQw4aHYv0x9xY2E1nenMjzL+vgwCxFWcJM8dZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:12:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQYijky7g-K4dZF6x9NktnADuxRO6A=YAJxCF2gj85JHg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Rmhfq-00041c-Sn
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:12:17 -0000
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Internet censorship *is* a threat to bitcoin, if we don't stand up for our
> rights now we deserve anything that is coming. There will be no "long run".
Very few people actually care if they can load that particular URL ...
if you were talking about the forums it might matter more. It also
might make sense to run some informative popup, except people are
going to be seeing them all over the internet on higher traffic sites.
E.g.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_SOPA_Blackout_Design_%28derivative_A%29.png
|
