1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21190E3C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B56B18A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt20.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w08CjBnj031997;
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:11 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w08Cj7ES002818
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:08 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 855844008C;
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DEC7A202FC; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 07:45:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 07:45:06 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20180108124506.GA13858@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAAS2fgR-or=zksQ929Muvgr=sgzNSugGp669ZWYC6YkvEG=H5w@mail.gmail.com>
<ae570ccf-3a2c-a11c-57fa-6dad78cfb1a5@satoshilabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ae570ccf-3a2c-a11c-57fa-6dad78cfb1a5@satoshilabs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: c2a88fb6-f471-11e7-8106-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdgoUElQaAgsB Am4bWlZeVFh7WWo7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUwVgckYG c30eUht6dg0Ifnd4 ZAgxXCFTVBIoc1sr
RklVCGwHMGB9YGEf Vl1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXEy1J RRoNLFYbS11DBTM3 XR0eVS4vFFcIS20r
NR04I0IRVEUcIw0p OlssXF9w
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Satoshilabs secret shared private key scheme
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:45:14 -0000
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:39:20PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> > The construction also
> > will silently result in the user getting a different private key if
> > they enter the wrong passphrase-- which could lead to funds loss.
>=20
> Again, this is by design and it is main point why plausible deniability
> is achieved both in BIP39 and SLIP39. If we used a different
> construction we'd loose plausible deniability.
Can you explain _exactly_ what scenario the "plausible deniability" feature
refers to?
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaU2fPAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7nzwIAIZcmG6oRP4DwaNzs8c01ZGk
Fqa17SbU5P8Y9Y+yyN5jmMhLOjELTZXWauZTDViy2SCqp+peILAnylM639DCHYs2
wLNCOD1o4S5xTpmb1yaRPoSrkmbfqfFMQXNiaw86WhE+sU/srfXDEMqbxNs+bP+8
Xj514mtVDnUETFoWE2MHRVF5NE7mtkBLTBrar2ucdSYBuVEnm3Pp6MLnBbUvG5gl
Egv/K9Dt5PMHnUgaUDOmIEI7isxCIVv6vwgx7or2iCZdHR3O7zTFK8pxzN2wmySi
2ZMam9sP09HjSIILhHzBW7CuiFqvknHfcsmWWQnDbYS+a1Z+yUZBFLzedxhSEGs=
=Mi74
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
|
