1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Return-Path: <steven.charles.davis@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7B3B49
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:26:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com (mail-io0-f196.google.com
[209.85.223.196])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233883F6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id 84so544665iop.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date
:cc:to; bh=Dtw15BiH6zacBoQz7cAQSVplEMSjE2ETfKSNivjyEWc=;
b=Ym+d8spCO/E8Kpmh7RhDKnJ5WmLAcvpA8RIV88e6Z/LK+oUjLNdU3Wf5OqqsiSOX3q
0S2J34SX4MiudODfXl0/K9Q1tELzD7x7BcR1zQxBYyCOn+QfpwwJXk7QiFG1e5j885Ov
B9iOgjteGvfRVKGLHoNfXzwSGLPVU7X0/W2viFvMdqy675jsXNbKgD+fNQMvsbOJEbJQ
SHvPuoOmAVxkk138f4a+sIAqGWfrdsuDPR86VSAuzMqCA66m8PzFM0C9HiIZsvn1yA4L
ws47jUdpqnobgpTBTnQ/4fou56xNhlAQY+o3+Wubl43WsptT0cqVx7o59OisNvO1lsL/
AOwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
:subject:message-id:date:cc:to;
bh=Dtw15BiH6zacBoQz7cAQSVplEMSjE2ETfKSNivjyEWc=;
b=pE0auqaw3heYCpfYwuZmMqKTBkuVRfENOjJFggFNvj5RabOz7s8xyrtvIdGj/1QotJ
Xdsx/Ipr/HYJpznECXl9oiTvKzkPsGk2UcjDkX59NnY8eryq4Yratf6Lu6SHKGQH+t4H
dxpltNZ2LAXzBARjFt+lYFqUI+Ggt9I/6HmS/J7iERIU5pPQEbMX/qBrjP95KONiaIBg
DdKgL32G7spltVb1wBG/+LR9jRaSrOr4IZ68EzQnXzvB8RnTzsr7iM4i39CSVOclQZ8f
MzIIsiimAQzebYOVjuCp7WP4WtIK+cyyOQFk9GF1QlwJiArcQFrnOzzbnJuIQP7et4Xr
CkIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110X/iheyhOCJ8bl8D1BYJQFlJXSSnHfQKxsDOMNWUEBGTBhGYkn
irWcK9MySodMmw==
X-Received: by 10.107.59.145 with SMTP id i139mr2585208ioa.94.1499812000547;
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.87] (71-81-80-204.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com.
[71.81.80.204])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k16sm300276itb.1.2017.07.11.15.26.39
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Davis <steven.charles.davis@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <8BFBAD12-1ECC-4333-80CA-E62FC1FBF96B@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:26:38 -0500
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:28:54 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:26:42 -0000
> I think it's great that people want to experiment with things like
> drivechains/sidechains and what not, but their security model is very
> distinct from Bitcoin=E2=80=99s
Agree that experimentation is great and that it is usually the case that =
the security model differs.
Isn=E2=80=99t it also true also that the security model for SegWit is =
distinct from that defined for the Bitcoin token?
It does not appear to be a "chain of digital signatures" as per the =
original definition? I do understand that the hash state is still =
respected at block level. I=E2=80=99m referring more to the token=E2=80=99=
s chain.
Any clarification appreciated.
Thanks,
/sd=
|
