blob: 07410d1911ed92062be36c91cd2a7eeaee2888e1 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WccgV-0000BM-2e
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:32:35 +0000
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WccgR-0003Um-Kd
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:32:35 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa1so5118816pad.0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=1e1G88Z0GF3fNpKB1nvXFRC4TmEODFJ8jZc+d2LtiAo=;
b=RU24mtFCXb4NJ3gTJpTGH/hnYjf1zKUbgNwo70tpof2c6qREOokB+bnhntntGbpRrX
rwYn4bzYHZQFQudg7m7avS3ek7Rpb+mJnjchxHE7BNRgM9VUPsHyu20T2JCBbW5cCRcP
qH4WM9EFeg5zdsXTXvIpvLCUdpCWjDvJunY+8QC/M5HFHf0lWHWY7ty2mqHtWfYGRLPr
fhKX70MLv8plSJMB86AHOi7XK6KFvfP+TI3U2x3osoNJqVOAO9nbkB8z5RqA73FeFs4/
5uELhBtaiOmm0TQq4LRCrJiXEIw8i6FY6wSrLmjX+mCU0aBPYAYBy3J48V9HxYgDQwxm
ELGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPuU3gNdRanSv3oXnwMsVu8TOlRSUTk8wLrOJcguBS39YevRUxcflIIonpSxaLFZix7CPk
X-Received: by 10.66.189.226 with SMTP id gl2mr44985510pac.65.1398180745664;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.192] (50-0-36-93.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.
[50.0.36.93])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ha2sm85671256pbb.8.2014.04.22.08.32.24
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53568B87.8040009@monetize.io>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:32:23 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAC7yFxSE8-TWPN-kuFiqdPKMDuprbiVJi7-z-ym+AUyA_f-xJw@mail.gmail.com> <CABh=4qNaJht-MnnjEguZ=UOuXN3uQ-s4-dkDUVErbHj6W44J_g@mail.gmail.com> <1927948.OEZHQcsQ9n@crushinator>
<2025496.b5Y3n7qx8B@crushinator>
<1582E990-4E14-4EF7-9C9C-AA505B815104@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <1582E990-4E14-4EF7-9C9C-AA505B815104@bitsofproof.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WccgR-0003Um-Kd
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret
Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:32:35 -0000
Testnet vs mainnet is quite a separate issue than bitcoin vs altcoin.
Unfortunately few of the alts ever figured this out.
On 04/22/2014 01:39 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> Extra encoding for testnet is quite useless complexity in face of many
> alt chains.
> BIPS should be chain agnostic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tamas Blummer
> http://bitsofproof.com
|
