blob: 6887c89d98186d1d7b8d36fe0219924310f5e2f2 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <thomas@thomaszander.se>) id 1YqgSp-0005ng-9G
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 08 May 2015 11:29:07 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from slow.vmail.no ([193.75.16.12])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1YqgSn-0000km-GO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 08 May 2015 11:29:07 +0000
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11])
by slow.vmail.no (slow1.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id A8DD687DC5
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 8 May 2015 13:03:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 955DB4056A
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 8 May 2015 13:02:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28])
by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id 745B33FAB8
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 8 May 2015 13:02:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from coldstorage.localnet (unknown [81.191.182.184])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B57412
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 8 May 2015 13:02:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:02:56 +0200
Message-ID: <1551544.DzLxgCKLBq@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150507014952.GA5657@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me>
<20150507014952.GA5657@savin.petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YqgSn-0000km-GO
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:29:07 -0000
On Wednesday 6. May 2015 21.49.52 Peter Todd wrote:
> I'm not sure if you've seen this, but a good paper on this topic was
> published recently: "The Economics of Bitcoin Transaction Fees"
The obvious flaw in this paper is that it talks about a block size in todays
(trivial) data-flow economy and compares it with the zero-reward situation
decades from now.
Its comparing two things that will never exist at the same time (unless
Bitcoin fails).
--
Thomas Zander
|
