summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e7/a7fda3c9eef2950ec5a01f50a1746e1fb60865
blob: c25d6acf6c40a05a8abab0d1730ffa46528da1dc (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <shadders.del@gmail.com>) id 1R1brr-00026x-8h
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:29:59 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.83.52 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.83.52; envelope-from=shadders.del@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-gw0-f52.google.com; 
Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1R1brq-0003s7-9X
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:29:59 +0000
Received: by mail-gw0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 15so782495gwj.11
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.175.2 with SMTP id c2mr69053anp.103.1315477798026;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.50] (155.88-67-202.dynamic.dsl.syd.iprimus.net.au
	[202.67.88.155])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm333673ant.0.2011.09.08.03.29.55
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E68991E.2030806@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:29:50 +1000
From: Steve <shadders.del@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/3.1.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
References: <4E6879B6.7090203@gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1UV+7aG0hQbwV1ikfE0i_y6Pu3GnnbQd5756tNNpM29Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1UV+7aG0hQbwV1ikfE0i_y6Pu3GnnbQd5756tNNpM29Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(shadders.del[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1R1brq-0003s7-9X
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoind multiplexing proxy -
 request/response routing problem
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shadders.del@gmail.com
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:29:59 -0000


> It's probably best to keep this discussion on just one mailing list. 
> It's confusing to have duplicate threads in different places. People 
> will end up making the same points.
>

Fair enough I'll take it to the bitcoinj list.  I wanted to post here in 
case I got any nibbles from c developers about option 2.  If anyone 
want's the follow this discussion on the other list it's here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoinj/kqiBq9VxL-k