summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e6/fe43cd56ba06d1b7d6606d133c9427bcf3ae5e
blob: 5ab51d52e27a4af983bdd3c5aaca22afeecc8729 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
Return-Path: <zachgrw@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B17C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBB960B1D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id T5eqyRUHbT9L
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F24260774
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id o5so8924272ils.11
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=WvF09wUYBKpl1e6+Z0KCbXANOpE1usZ+f0sGQd/EuUU=;
 b=aPs2GgksxAN5O1i0piEIDrvEs/jZpDJcU3X0465Fdl7fHpA06lhnzlDJv/773WTIfW
 ZOlpbVydFH37kbEeHcF6ZSNatGZhLRMmDhf505P8FW3Vu/rqpwot3hYH27A6s4ClWzpz
 1E6LPzTdPkR/rf7soz3r30mMEAP2mQ40mXwBKE2qJy8ofk9//H4OCbVlbSeNwey5ZJkj
 1F3bFjSTCiM/mXZeOI1FN3mY3orcNfk7O82mfOemFwnIm20cZmXuaiBFh7p2J2qiV1dn
 bl4jrNMu1G9SLaWvSraVw2KVdznMJF/erVSahdxz88JQcTlrJ+022r47F2kde/9mJ5BI
 Hd+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=WvF09wUYBKpl1e6+Z0KCbXANOpE1usZ+f0sGQd/EuUU=;
 b=IqYwhwROHRTRNFIH8xeNBIFr9v8SWew5DS8os4PfIlJtEG9OAI9AY2KTvXVSaljv1t
 5V0NNYjI3VjLqV8HM+BoGhamLBu3/2bOf4bInQKDKE5vV+058TJkzQUUuTHCNX4Zhsdv
 MBmu+ITV28l66/Sh/3SoteYq4jtjOt6PnC6+U1dqKA4B4B/AA3xucPCAfze+nrx5HOet
 imqx4B2XA1HMG/BYhmjb7vwuHlcc6Vaow4rZ5tNw3fE8qkn2AIpgoEkgJc8rzwCWDTSp
 4gqlYa+bGpKU2PoapBQcC7SJL9pSIEIP4EPD/W6rLQG96RmIu7Ih1tab8ylKKccwYIBr
 5AXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530OP2l2c5GZyKi1tYNTJxBQ1rVAnYgvAxbYO8XK5+fgykWWd0Fk
 O8XVn0xtK97wPq1aH8psc8+A2yG4wg4hnA9+T5A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCbuIBb/esojehKXLT7qhP5jPOu9mM9447vEwtbgGOsMePKLgfzv2wqn0HsHUZDkgLUkEbgtTgmWB/gxPQ+7k=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1d04:b0:2cc:4c42:9b99 with SMTP id
 i4-20020a056e021d0400b002cc4c429b99mr6072082ila.168.1650877580237; Mon, 25
 Apr 2022 02:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RyYBRY3MJP_0b2YkCEUFBdP8u1A_cGSEEkDbzKK9k-rkINZrBaOL70L96iHR11bJhmkhAzuN6uZ1X8PQgz2wa8Us3-2OpNa4RbhSSprw_WE=@protonmail.com>
 <CALeFGL1=4PrA_ziTsoS9sUjGjfLr54AiMfM99uDV-Bau5Ab_eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ4-pEADrHf_YR5ZBfJW+eefKrp1iEj4wAi72UrwRSi9gaVP+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <B037C028-EB25-4197-A0F1-48838D1AD30F@petertodd.org>
 <tBEO_7gKqAlgiRpjC1OCLMBcLddK0ffNlbdU65VhXnXqZQiDCTDNOw8sfTXqNXZxVA8wA0uodTLvptt7Iy5O3D_6hkiVVfLegOrg9C1Snkg=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <tBEO_7gKqAlgiRpjC1OCLMBcLddK0ffNlbdU65VhXnXqZQiDCTDNOw8sfTXqNXZxVA8wA0uodTLvptt7Iy5O3D_6hkiVVfLegOrg9C1Snkg=@protonmail.com>
From: Zac Greenwood <zachgrw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:06:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ4-pEB1zWxWapt3qit=X1p3WuSSn2_K=rygDp8JzpS7GimgMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bce09f05dd76e373"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:36:12 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] User Resisted Soft Fork for CTV
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:06:21 -0000

--000000000000bce09f05dd76e373
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> wrote

CTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from vaguely
> apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.


Other proposals exist that also benefit L2 solutions. What makes you
support CTV specifically?

Centrally documenting the implications of each side by side and point by
point might be a useful next step. This would enable a larger part of the
community to understand each proposal and may reduce repetition and
misunderstandings on this list.

Once a common understanding of the implications of each proposal is in
place, their tradeoffs can be considered, facilitating creating consensus
on which proposal benefits a maximum of users.

Zac

--000000000000bce09f05dd76e373
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj &lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com">ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote</div><di=
v dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;bo=
rder-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)" =
dir=3D"auto">CTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from =
vaguely apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.</blockquote><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Other proposals exist that also benef=
it L2 solutions. What makes you support CTV specifically?</div><div dir=3D"=
auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Centrally documenting the implications of=
 each side by side and point by point might be a useful next step. This wou=
ld enable a larger part of the community to understand each proposal and ma=
y reduce repetition and misunderstandings on this list.</div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Once a common understanding of the implicat=
ions of each proposal is in place, their tradeoffs can be considered, facil=
itating creating consensus on which proposal benefits a maximum of users.</=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Zac</div><div dir=3D"auto=
">=C2=A0<br></div></div></div>

--000000000000bce09f05dd76e373--