1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3417F958
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com
[209.85.215.42])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BD6153
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so12900276lal.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=tkcnYDTYr8vU3Btaw5hAueykpqr3uj+0UAwdEsny3Ws=;
b=VZMwaCaVgRtGt1juzGtxhCZKisqu6EJAvyL0yWjLR3HmIzvEPTxlT0Iw8nDQDF1gWm
mBa2L4XDkmm1JD4dfYKDiquUFSLoYmWQLMKhAQYz+V9kkHvwIev1baZXbsjHsNz34CDI
DUbO0bQ2Pv4ngGD5ySaqsEnBgOIvs2ebfexknJlYLp+e0eqpWkeORVzBwwUwTbx15AdZ
TRJLr0BnoKdCmmMhg99JkjkirK+EB05MclPmEsJuzy/CAuaDWZoAVORH6vi8NOYNG1Cf
MFO0TB3q3SQBCE//43+on3amaa3PqrdO7T8US4FjbhCmlafj1Tl/WBm6vjFJ3Cvov1rQ
8Aaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzvvRnmd5sxkOsQdJLbQjl0v1WKsvYSU/97+oKBFUUAM5WmIXCkNin8nThs4o1D57vC/GP
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.151.178 with SMTP id ur18mr225969lbb.59.1440029669070;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150819234428.15540430E1@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzsPT7n+favkjHSuWh1YGQPZQAFLyOgxu4wDNwXSa_-3og@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzvCdHk1uo5T3rHyvpAYP1W95h7T+uMhA8vjg2BzEPzy2g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEz79PohW+Y1bOP1uaF9KWCMdW=dOq+kHxNa0h6pKz3RghDGjw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGLBAhdSvRaQ2uRzRKLz+osMuLN87AXRz+9kG=KJhWJBU3W3jw@mail.gmail.com>
<20150819234428.15540430E1@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 02:14:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDq7T6KyVwM68rH+48Fx8ZX3qze+iCY85a7xpgxDmTr9hQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re:
Bitcoin XT Fork)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:31 -0000
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:44 AM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Number of posts, August:
>
> 72, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n
Certainly I have talked to much this month, my apologies.
I believe most of my posts (if not all) were on-topic but I could
still had repeated myself much less.
I've been trying to concentrate my usual points in documents or
threads that I can link to so that my comments can be shorter.
But, yes, most of my posts have been related to general consensus
topics and not specific to Bitcoin Core development (that's part of
why I think the bitcoin-consensus and bitcoin-dev lists would be a
good separation).
In any case, my apologies for this unplanned record.
|
