1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
|
Return-Path: <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727F2486
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:04:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com
[209.85.218.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64EE157
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:04:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oiew67 with SMTP id w67so92604205oie.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=FbfnMsgCCpNMcHWanVkvkEGVUV6ZYKuAw2hUY0K4mo8=;
b=UXtfDatdRm/0SViIIcnuzU4LmRKIUfaq4owRacJUg6JXClayGMB5SCJJH9Qcg26HFZ
r9HXf4blfGb8u5MbLc+/eQ5dR3R2LVuTdgHzkhTpRr1q1SbFzCtE/IZv0E3C1Ml2YwNP
/k3i3tWt3h7z1SXOB05RJhnQDmAe+Rovf2G151uI2rvB8IIpUaITSjkWQZ9OGAl/iq1z
+q0YvCIFIPzpR/5GOoUvPF4hW/nbWtVh5BzxSc/266U0PMRh5lSFCYBC34fINwKMCfQr
tdni2u3y+Rzqb6tUKY1X0et4LA3S3XQPTnMqB3tlIRcECv0Pgqf6wI8fmuK9kDvgvtUT
pCSw==
X-Received: by 10.202.83.66 with SMTP id h63mr7971233oib.119.1439946273091;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.78.77 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2CxRASFOfSxAp4a-6N8CcQipwQA1qn7kk0-98LeV1wCKfREw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
<55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de>
<CAEz79PrqhSOJzTNWRDv5UfRJa1-f=1OE_pDs0vtHazHso1_5pw@mail.gmail.com>
<55D24625.40806@olivere.de>
<CAEz79PoMgax-Jk1UYP82XzK13r=-e7mgSvpsDE1h4bOATZbKCg@mail.gmail.com>
<55D38025.4030605@olivere.de>
<CAH2CxRASFOfSxAp4a-6N8CcQipwQA1qn7kk0-98LeV1wCKfREw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:03:53 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-oABTSE_rxi0PgdzKMeZXp1A2+e8RrWvufM+euMOOJLXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anon Moto <daggerhashimoto@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:04:34 -0000
--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Just to add some superfluous and unessential spice to this discussion,
there were two Satoshi users originally registered in sourceforge, one
registered very soon after the other. So I say Satoshi were at least two
people, so it may be the case that one Satoshi re-appeared, but the other
did not.
Ore maybe one Satoshi is for Bitcoin XT, and the other Satoshi is against
it.
Satoshi wars!
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Anon Moto via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> And this is how the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can't stop
> TCP/IP, but they sure can take over the development team. It's a good thing
> that no one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the
> bitcoin development team. Phew...
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
>> > I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you
>> > are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be
>> > active in development again?
>>
>> Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I
>> think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the
>> impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the
>> moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly
>> whether it was Satoshi or not.
>>
>> Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute
>> priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork
>> should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the
>> cows come home.
>>
>> But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which
>> site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.
>> That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.
>>
>> - oliver
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Just to add some superfluous and unessential spice to this=
discussion, there were two Satoshi users originally registered in sourcefo=
rge, one registered very soon after the other. So I say Satoshi were at lea=
st two people, so it may be the case that one Satoshi re-appeared, but the =
other did not.=C2=A0<div><br><div>Ore maybe one Satoshi is for Bitcoin XT, =
and the other Satoshi is against it.</div><div><br></div><div>Satoshi wars!=
<br><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Anon Moto via bitcoin-=
dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundati=
on.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></sp=
an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">And this is h=
ow the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can't stop TCP/IP, but t=
hey sure can take over the development team. It's a good thing that no =
one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the bitcoin dev=
elopment team. Phew...<br><br></div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"=
><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, =
2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bit=
coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex"><span>Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:<br>
> I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense tha=
t you<br>
> are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted =
to be<br>
> active in development again?<br>
<br>
</span>Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. =
I<br>
think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the<br>
impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the<br>
moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly<br>
whether it was Satoshi or not.<br>
<br>
Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute<br>
priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork<br=
>
should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the<br=
>
cows come home.<br>
<br>
But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which<br>
site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.<br>
That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.<br>
<div><div><br>
- oliver<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0--
|
