1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116CD949
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com (mail-pg0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9C5A4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 3so36443319pgj.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:37:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id
:references:in-reply-to:to;
bh=+2IpYkirqpcml6ErXbY5A6jxL+HfcWes0xg+5RkWAX0=;
b=ZYDMiUbgrzDAOfRrpmU+Es9Sn0bVoUWKuoL+ZRmznk5oHEKdXjzV0r60UQ0sNOXW5U
OZ5R3Elt+/hQrcr+OYCDmwOsLX47dFXkY5zPTJFeH1YtySeCqCOQDZ+bES617kryDitb
nWn9frs2V7/WR/6Nte2rtIFqi8kuuPPsLT+fhEsMU8QyC5Ub1aShK1VVf+ZaymsS8fOK
zivHItl09JMEnHeNfpFL95PSyYx7IqWa6PmmJk1DyxeAZE7F1TUMQMU2afcCYGPjqTQ3
9OQbKk+zT7R1QGkt2L8fDlBpii1Drvj9odHY62eEbr3sSIrPPmXSyOWytSi15p+74sAB
5zIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date
:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to;
bh=+2IpYkirqpcml6ErXbY5A6jxL+HfcWes0xg+5RkWAX0=;
b=kpUXL+sDe1OM4HPjYeGsuTDhELozWpJ5F3mr2AHfNKN85LpZLFwStgJtLdaEtCAASP
526/f4HnWkHbwRbgyya0hz8RNnprmvukygCLQx0HLn2bhW5/qx6xDuJorayZgKmVhZhG
c4HrsdPyDfSgyDNBHmnzTWiY9AmE+9MUtaVGvJ6tIxv41Fyl0Okh2NbzbmfoDHxw1i84
rF5ypRinT1xFctaMN0rxRS0DPh4HcfV0ItZfMrJwcnOxDlpO9cnSFdxog5+W2g4XjS7J
AJb3f4nvsdht1thKDs6dtu2ecixmnahaxBbdI2swHaxeuynPb+t7EJTXLlQuCZGQV+bl
gZ1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIZeoKC4QEmNIxnmfG0I0o77Z7PSqNtAhHR0UnTarSfa8W3ke7QuRC0IEP7p3kORQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.143.131 with SMTP id 3mr26537037plz.56.1485718629743;
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.228.186.221] (mobile-166-176-184-44.mycingular.net.
[166.176.184.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
u82sm26395315pfd.7.2017.01.29.11.37.08
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:37:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:37:07 -0800
Message-Id: <4C206BDC-CCAB-4F4B-9356-6FA7652E467A@voskuil.org>
References: <201701270107.01092.luke@dashjr.org> <20170127212810.GA5856@nex>
<CAAy62_KUSNTjivwJT87K9f1c=k-6gdaLXEBJjcy2KK+uLSTWDA@mail.gmail.com>
<201701280403.05558.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAAt2M183=L=9N3HKVgGbsFbug4LWkGfMQzzcDQu9xxMJL+L1oA@mail.gmail.com>
<A6A9E83E-6A5A-4583-A4E3-A52DF33DCF4F@petertodd.org>
<583ef2d2-8315-da9f-7815-768cb4ccb515@thinlink.com>
In-Reply-To: <583ef2d2-8315-da9f-7815-768cb4ccb515@thinlink.com>
To: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14C92)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:27:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three hardfork-related BIPs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:37:11 -0000
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lis=
ts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On 1/28/2017 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> a world of nodes in large datacenters is a world where it's very easy
>> to force the few Bitcoin nodes remaining to follow AML/KYC rules
>=20
> If that's true, why haven't we already seen AML/KYC required of mining
> pools? That would be comparatively trivial.
It is true, there is no question. The fact that an attack does not appear to=
have occurred does not mean that the vulnerability exists. It is as you say=
a trivial exploit, which means it will happen when the economic incentive i=
s great enough. Analogous attacks on other points of centralization are alre=
ady well underway.
e=
|
