1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Wk9yr-0002Be-Gu
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.219.44; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-oa0-f44.google.com;
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Wk9yq-00056j-H2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id o6so139159oag.3
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.219.167 with SMTP id pp7mr1491040obc.85.1399977035007;
Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.162 with HTTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79Prrpwi6SXyCpGesmkdau6vjtwELAhr6quXtFZ6_t1-y2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEz79Prrpwi6SXyCpGesmkdau6vjtwELAhr6quXtFZ6_t1-y2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:30:34 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: IYHPXauK7HIiBd9uibqs4f8Jy6Y
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1--8C0Tf=RF1Hi9sXq5wbUC1feBswkGMcwGxwgZ1UYKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wk9yq-00056j-H2
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 -0000
--089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be
changed.
You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be
the same?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be
> unique so they are no longer identical to testnet.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes
> For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R.
>
> We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support
> this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect
> regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently
> handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions.
>
> Warren Togami
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
> available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would als=
o have to be changed.<div><br></div><div>You didn't provide a rationale=
for this. What's the cost of having them be the same?</div></div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren=
Togami Jr. <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:wtogami@gmail.com" targ=
et=3D"_blank">wtogami@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi folks,<div><br></div><div>I propose changing all of the=
address versions in -regtest mode to be unique so they are no longer ident=
ical to testnet.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://en.bitcoin.it/=
wiki/List_of_address_prefixes" target=3D"_blank">https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki=
/List_of_address_prefixes</a><br>
</div><div>For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or=
R.</div><div><br></div><div>We need to know if any existing tools would ne=
ed to be modified to support this change to regtest. =C2=A0Do existing tool=
s outside of pull tester expect regtest to have testnet addresses? =C2=A0If=
the quantity of tools that currently handle regtest is small then we can m=
odify them to the new address versions.</div>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
<div><br></div><div>Warren Togami</div><div><br></div></font></span></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE=
<br>
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.<br>
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform availa=
ble<br>
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.net=
/sfu/SauceLabs</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59--
|
