1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D6FC002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:01:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85877400F8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:01:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 85877400F8
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=bdwPA26Q
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19covfxv76kk
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:01:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org E634C40017
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.28])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E634C40017
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:01:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9B35C0075;
Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:01:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 21:01:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to
:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender
:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675562473; x=1675648873; bh=x
od4IiiK2r9/teOsZlK9oCswfGagnr+lh0gU87BPTrs=; b=bdwPA26Qz3GlYwyd7
kciwdF5C8piGb5xlSlZM9AHb4wkFg3uK3k0REkgGSkZsggYa39X0dcOmtYOhI+yG
ZnJnyH2H/uYaIUVA5lcxqMY2GfRTh8nJFhQ02oFfNB2lj0Av/bOc/VcNZFTwQKO2
oSKVWfiAgs/M3SG7yFWsXStocCgwKqIXqa/QlbGVabiNB/h8aaPI2LFkOA+h6QFD
anljgLlxdWCbjMsms5EgPo+vXr1mb2fuY8P0f/C5IVkSX0rqcFKvarxB5VeDUHaH
zKPwoTO5hvf7l/o4mAJshKCQLBepNbYJsoTlm4UsFM5yzv+Oyxnxg7PzcroKZZu4
wYm+A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6A3fY2yHPW4TMQxf0K6YndvcBRdUZpBpWcRO5FHfIgIdn7gzVnORqA>
<xme:6A3fYyTNY_9Bx5f2jWts61RdwL6cl3qSQNxHqM7srmjK-VrCuatPExZuhJT5lF_RM
hT7gzHO6PKrMLH_nbc>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:6A3fY4UIXbRe_W55hs2w8RkOYOtSvTO6Mvy8qnfRxxHW3b4LcepUNvgLsnmC>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegfedggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvffufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpefhteeuleffvddujeejteejjefgjeefleeiieejudeiiedvueegffefueeglefg
ueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvg
htvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6A3fY8iKw9bjhJ25ORR2tlGzLdmypkpBqga3SPCpDAkdXwPmhgF7Hw>
<xmx:6A3fY4CLlbxufB_6hj438dkjpGvizjf4n__1uFrTxl1VnDOpuWLNKg>
<xmx:6A3fY9IB6MFcdle_okT8HO3TKoH5S24w8JURhyospIOZX77_Lw5czA>
<xmx:6Q3fY78g1elY2pqgJ4K2j02uEpI7ehgZtghpi0RlqOYCw49ykCnbCw>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat,
4 Feb 2023 21:01:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 03:01:08 +0100
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@blockstream.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoKkAdQ9TSMm4vPJOrThu_h6VbqwPhOQQR7-Yr+WZ0DMBYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
<ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com>
<57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
<CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABE6yHtM2Dqc63_eURSr7dMirJti5sYnqvHj7vQ_Ab9FC_d04g@mail.gmail.com>
<3d00aacb-585d-f875-784d-34352860d725@peersm.com>
<CACrqygB_FbsRGWYPSUEFTnP15y94Hmo4JtAuv6bH1D3YtbAw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
<b292d887-cbd5-165c-de01-793df2b5e8f3@peersm.com>
<CACrqygAv842ucN7PLYMENXFiSwAZJy2Y+FziJXrWjyCcOXmL3g@mail.gmail.com>
<230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com>
<CAMZUoKkAdQ9TSMm4vPJOrThu_h6VbqwPhOQQR7-Yr+WZ0DMBYw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <76718304-A8E3-46E6-B2F7-DE86831F15DF@petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 02:01:16 -0000
On February 5, 2023 1:11:35 AM GMT+01:00, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev=
<bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg> wrote:
>Since bytes in the witness are cheaper than bytes in the script pubkey,
>there is a crossover point in data size where it will simply be cheaper t=
o
>use witness data=2E Where that crossover point is depends on the finer
>details of the overhead of the two methods, but you could make some
>reasonable assumptions=2E Such a calculation could form the basis of a
>reasonable OP_RETURN proposal=2E I don't know if it would be persuasive,=
but
>it would at least be coherent=2E
I don't think it's worth the technical complexity trying to carefully argu=
e a specific limit=2E Let users decide for themselves how they want to use =
OpReturn=2E
|
