summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e1/c64f3ff2d788d554b1865d0d6bebd3bd580307
blob: 6fc0227982b1289828da0361ebd7b22fb7427697 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Return-Path: <yanmaani@cock.li>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AA4C0012
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C5760F19
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.203
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cock.li
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id JqtbXS5wP32U
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail.cock.li (mail.cock.li [37.120.193.124])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CF960669
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:00 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cock.li; s=mail;
 t=1639602652; bh=k6WTEXsKQGP9gmXvGHGU3hcpigCVhqeYwxWH1x8QjLw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=FpTjd+paBr23b6nOW51DZqDgzVlgR6qzvDnNnQ9lJVogyA8nkMtSigm19legwbG3Q
 n8xl1UDiU5kp+yugoMz3fSD6vDr8u/NbCuoa2oKyA3RlVCrhf4wTZxhpZ8Lftuxxiz
 JmUoYA3lsTRD7dSpolJS96ukYCqnXsdQS1FMYuAT6uKkPyoTMTnP54CXE3sBCww2XN
 dUP655zTrtwTcU6Hpnoj0LHEVlPrBRpkIboEfAuSmy+04TqZjvbdZO3RSZCDZofpiV
 UvC6j9i0+PlBKEtClXbUiJHDz+Zt+s00ElX6+0KUm2bSmoEWQwd6fi1AQ+d6B2RRPo
 BEfHdN79XrXNQ==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:10:51 +0000
From: yanmaani@cock.li
To: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
 <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhgOK6p7fqZPha1jvDgo=4Syti9K46a2A48Eas44dn9v6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5xwhgOK6p7fqZPha1jvDgo=4Syti9K46a2A48Eas44dn9v6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5b87372e0a6a825e2927656a7a5d9cc9@cock.li>
X-Sender: yanmaani@cock.li
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.17
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:30:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin Advent Calendar] Decentralized
 Coordination Free Mining Pools
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 -0000

How does this differ from p2pool?

If you've just re-invented p2pool, shouldn't you credit their prior art?

Monero is doing their implementation of p2pool. They have viable solo 
mining, as far as I understand. The basic idea is you have several 
P2pools. If you have a block time of 10 minutes, p2pool has 20% of 
hashrate, and there's 100 p2pool chains, each chain gets 0.2% of net 
hash. If you're OK with 20s block times (orphans aren't really a big 
problem), you need (20/600) * (0.02/100) = 0.00067% of network hash to 
get a payout every 10m.