summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e1/4deb23b705f4fc4d31b03174fd2240d8132fdc
blob: b7637c4bfa71720b2645aef5021a8483914ac771 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1XF5Ah-0007av-06
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:38:43 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.149.81 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.149.81; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail149081.authsmtp.net; 
Received: from outmail149081.authsmtp.net ([62.13.149.81])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1XF5Af-0001oX-Nd for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:38:42 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
	by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s76HcZvl032243;
	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:38:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [25.186.101.212] ([24.114.23.154]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s76HcR66004968
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:38:30 +0100 (BST)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <53E26623.3070107@monetize.io>
References: <CA+iPb=HkxeVPF0SynxCPgUkq4msrdfayFrVNFjzg29rFwqXv1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0O2wFq2Vs5Bes_8x1q_j0VC+U4DQkx=6GqT8w5e8Lh5Qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+iPb=ET+A-qB8TgPX8D-ut1DWnq9tZJ=14igfRVWO6eog6Xgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<53E1A8AF.4030206@thinlink.com>
	<CAJHLa0MfRhCPX8H92qc1kSebc=WrUzmSgbG331t4-zDHhTNu4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3eEiLxYfsAURRm4ysfS4TRgXxa_THxJ43cVH1OyR95JQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<53E23F49.3020605@thinlink.com>
	<CAJHLa0OtPA3DGQuJhp3zkK5dnBux6TFAw3qDsBdO0zaxrqBgRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALxbBHXh-Fktsr96PMXdohJdgcUKoNreJ-ZuApKOX3-qSkdk2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<63a80796-609e-43f5-9280-4cd8cf5d2648@email.android.com>
	<53E2585C.8070009@monetize.io>
	<cafd8184-f589-4709-90f3-f3a38f2dd8d0@email.android.com>
	<53E26623.3070107@monetize.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:38:23 -0700
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>,
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <58d8e86f-79fc-417d-a001-951c12638a4a@email.android.com>
X-Server-Quench: 7cb1fd41-1d90-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aAdMdgQUGUATAgsB AmIbWlxeU1V7WmA7 aQ5PbARZfEhNQQRv
	VFdNRFdNFUsrBhp5 VXwYVBlycwxAcDB3 YkBjEHcIDkUsIUJ8
	X08AHG0bZGY1bH0W BkdcagNUcgZDfk5E aVUrVz1vNG8XDQg5
	AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCUoGAjMm QhEEHC4zHEZNWz86
	KQcvIUIdG0BZP1Uq MEEoRVMfNXc8
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.23.154/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [62.13.149.81 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1XF5Af-0001oX-Nd
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] deterministic transaction expiration
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:38:43 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 6 August 2014 10:30:11 GMT-07:00, Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io> wrote:
>On 08/06/2014 01:20 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>> The general case doesn't require transmission of any merkle data; it
>> is derived from the tx data.
>
>How can that possibly be the case? The information is hidden behind the
>Merkle root in the transaction. The validator needs to know whether
>there is an expiry and what it is. What's it supposed to do, guess?

The general case is all committed information is included in the transaction; the merkle tree is a compatibility path, as well as an optimisation for lite clients and applications.

You should read more about soft-forks; see the BIP. Remember that Bitcoin protocol development and deployment is not a centrally controlled activity.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1

iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJT4mgPMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhSYlCAC1ncAGQt53HKS+8/rq
OG0RGrqE2l2/qCM/ybd9M8TkwxaI3NB5bqfIus8dB5MnyiTBFS3ooN54kNNOHtSX
2rEzPJphtOj46tk3nqe1QO3cbFJPjBCtxZff51DWZckhCiO2Iy1Br3fK3v55iscp
1jxyZnpfgUG/Ivfx+h6vkisucBXgXJ82d5vzvMIMxixh4v2+4/SAcSY6HCLIpxmV
Z3l0NcGllnmWe5B6eftpWYUAREuoCNk/671jHmwu0cqk2u/Egrp776zxkEO1xivH
d0EWjJmlDLmQ2hEhkpBq46ji/2m4EWPLqTW/EXf3RzwU8uCEldbxEe2tyZ0d6oBt
NnTE
=AhV7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----