summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e0/8b8298d6b41fe0be1a1ecae8e96885717a617e
blob: f25379a84886746ae7424d0b97130b64b69f2400 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
Return-Path: <asperous2@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD966E41
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  5 Sep 2015 21:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com
	[209.85.223.180])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4203D254
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  5 Sep 2015 21:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so56340834ioi.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=iWsbWJ+C7sghhYtBRQcIapdUtcbOQHaZN5YYWG4pqXg=;
	b=dL7VKK7CqHfHCwWCa/eHz0r+0tAgvdgu4NXkdjLT/l8I5LCbDW4dTDRc3sNGLGX0aA
	6Powqf8T00gD0HcOzCBeeQ5Az1SWk8bdCmpw2Ms2e1wOaKC7loAh46CJoKUbmMcE3Gxj
	XJgqocgHCavdSD4shyECrV0/ShE9mvRtMYz6IBC9oUR0iav01U71ULievvt0/Mr5cnxS
	oKZrFWRRk5HPDs5i90a48S3zEiGmoeLmdAk2hu5/eNdyjPtIWo7plw4BH84kUtEfgy7I
	ZN+Ds1SyItfH8jlxjjJ3SoyWwOEDBWb+EJGRyGoh05+ZpH9ZEUB9vwwWBMos1sURcjPW
	HJnA==
X-Received: by 10.107.166.139 with SMTP id p133mr18629467ioe.113.1441488010686;
	Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: asperous2@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.3.33 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Sep 2015 14:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201509042145.34410.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <64B72DF6-BE37-4624-ADAA-CE28C14A4227@gmail.com>
	<201509042101.11839.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAAxp-m8pgvHqUcmjCt6W5uscgb9ErtiTHdR0-nKU6OVdCE7rXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201509042145.34410.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Andy Chase <theandychase@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 14:19:51 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w1GuDhSwolnL5vMWjGFCg3GXy04
Message-ID: <CAAxp-m8JW-WOCem6a4RmBk7HOV3cCc02r5r=BkEDyUBu84u4=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>, gmaxwell@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141ef3cd337ab051f0694d5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP/Draft] BIP Acceptance Process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 21:20:11 -0000

--001a1141ef3cd337ab051f0694d5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Okay for sure yeah writing another proposal that reflects the current state
of affairs as people see it might provide some interesting perspective on
this proposal. I would welcome that.

Greg: With no other direct comments appearing to be inbound I'd like to
move forward with this one and get a number assigned to it. Thanks!

Thanks to all for the discussion!

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

> On Friday, September 04, 2015 9:36:42 PM Andy Chase wrote:
> > I understand your concerns. What kinds of changes do you think should go
> > through a process like this? Just hard forks?
>
> The process loses meaning if it doesn't reflect reality. So only hardforks
> should go through the hardfork process; only softforks through the softfork
> process; etc. Trying to make one-size-fits-all just means de facto accepted
> BIPs wouldn't be recognised as such because nobody cares to meet the higher
> requirements.
>
> Luke
>

--001a1141ef3cd337ab051f0694d5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Okay for sure yeah writing another proposal that reflects =
the current state of affairs as people see it might provide some interestin=
g perspective on this proposal. I would welcome that.<div><br></div><div>Gr=
eg: With no other direct comments appearing to be inbound I&#39;d like to m=
ove forward with this one and get a number assigned to it. Thanks!</div><di=
v><br></div><div>Thanks to all for the discussion!</div></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM=
, Luke Dashjr <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org" targ=
et=3D"_blank">luke@dashjr.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding=
-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Friday, September 04, 2015 9:36:42 PM Andy C=
hase wrote:<br>
&gt; I understand your concerns. What kinds of changes do you think should =
go<br>
&gt; through a process like this? Just hard forks?<br>
<br>
</span>The process loses meaning if it doesn&#39;t reflect reality. So only=
 hardforks<br>
should go through the hardfork process; only softforks through the softfork=
<br>
process; etc. Trying to make one-size-fits-all just means de facto accepted=
<br>
BIPs wouldn&#39;t be recognised as such because nobody cares to meet the hi=
gher<br>
requirements.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Luke<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1141ef3cd337ab051f0694d5--