1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C13499
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
[209.85.212.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA93B172
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so30580522wib.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=QtCptDDgIDLmESS5B9U46FzmCBiGteIjvlzbRRTCLf4=;
b=abivQkbt1vtb9kMKCgCbhEA3wdwBW9JF2bvkuC9lfHTYwKx9yKORRd5/GaWzz+4YQj
riOtWGMlVNtZocQimWUTctrEO8VtthoZ/ENKYJ+YUrw2VsaAUD8WP3r6UMNqwbT2bnuF
cCevrj9shfa+jD5MJLhyTPHi0/boE/XtMxqe0jS7ZDMhL+MWCKkCpfgyTx8/4mVnqIsy
RAjqlihGN3UlsyYnM6BZTBDcsB169KyRa/mzRIhK50s4uysogXWKo0208a97LNodAlEZ
VX90rK2TQ879ft5jD/emaXqSMaAo8xD0apS0d+T5ud1XCYvbnI+evMHYVWtLgKDKD4rt
vPzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnB1M+FEcBQ0qq2S1SIunuqejYBd7p+G3WtS6IvcFyuB54nQGiledUJs38Kcx/ZAjcoEhqj
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr90048653wjb.133.1438279221664;
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqGqPEpJYVmZpnwSS3WOmZat8w5xAONLED+C9+VBuQ8_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBj-wA1DMrwkQRWnzQoB5NR-q=2-5=WDAAUYfSpXRZSTqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrHjfkC+whh3Vh2LZNdSR1WSAXpNitR-jEdxtbKj7J25g@mail.gmail.com>
<55BA5283.2000405@mail.bihthai.net>
<CABm2gDqGqPEpJYVmZpnwSS3WOmZat8w5xAONLED+C9+VBuQ8_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:00:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDr8A6dM_OK-CmMLqN7jUBAcm1UFEpQ7KybcXEbdi6Xpdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:24 -0000
Gavin, Pieter, Mark, Gary, can we move the median time discussion to
its own thread?
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009731.htm=
l
I really don't want to fill this thread with that discussion.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail.bihthai.net>=
wrote:
>> I just had a look your existing Size N testnet code
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382
>> and i'll set up a node over the weekend and post its address in that
>> PR's conversation. Do you or anyone else already have a node running?
>> what blocksize?
>
> Great! No, I'm not running any node right now at any size.
> Take into account that it's not a regular testnet (ie like testnet3),
> it's a regtest-like testnet to make mining and simulations cheap.
> That also means that anybody can trivially create reorgs, so it is
> expected to be used in a controlled environment (you can control which
> node creates a new block and when).
|
