summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/df/1977453a4d50b3de4cf0a0c373acd826678375
blob: a2905b599e2e4fb27e1f4d34a1c7551ac3312b06 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5DDFEF
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.213.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F244D2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y8so13798001igp.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:58:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
	:content-type; bh=mEExWfcN4spnzhdN6w9axA2tBQmgoXBrmNdnJFtxQ+M=;
	b=xek6kguh/9Mt7NaVBuJAQlvahIp6Psg+6kHlgCn1mgi20kv2/OCjgoeE4liOOojHwH
	6FvDoN+wQlSI2VZl2YTgMHU7lc+FWOFJCse8KBHFKUDhdfGdMQxp1R8Iokt0VnQ5mMZ3
	cYlnr0SgzKwFozKMrSLynha/ftmae4Hw2mMqI7ofAlxHL4CQDD41rQz26RyMmOuWNPkU
	WyEAluJ7Qw6kTcyJg9PQaaayRXewma8E8TusDzfFakK9AcXXvWBriTiZNT/sDS8Qx5vw
	0JggWCuuMar4NPYdUk+KqXi1bDX1MvkTF4QyBWUSjUITHJlaK/AwfKaiXgwtm2RVye1s
	47UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type;
	bh=mEExWfcN4spnzhdN6w9axA2tBQmgoXBrmNdnJFtxQ+M=;
	b=G9THgtU/lcuUHJD2+epdlrn2ZL9TP+kfXrQM/7x9/P2TTEIrlA0CWzLrgcrqUhZhbq
	bT6/fQG1z97rNOWFmJjLArBj1rJGEU4ALpUY7b4Fhvx7Mwg574S7qZXv+kNVWzXMj4y+
	XRI/IG87xAk2VuUZp4cnlEcHG0GYXlM8P4s1W7dAl+G+tAMytKDL388bQLs8dsqOL7el
	J3u/KVbaAnOIfw0VEMP+RI0nWcpxQ3kQEk6QjHVXdir6htLL+SXn+D5zS4HwgMTcRcjJ
	umYxLoQcTK/F8GyaAXg2C8Kpc0XGc7NyBXONHm7uHib/RtXQQhBmMixBo+hek/3CybfT
	xEfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQqKSLqdy8/xT2KRRPKBI4xaDSKvQyw7MbuCJo4uJ7MTCvSqCm3Y6FhWWdY3u4R5RuPZe67nuLFvVn64g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.73.137 with SMTP id l9mr10076242igv.95.1455109081626;
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.77.65 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:58:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFVRnyq7xADJz9nfH05izyfLvGuB_+z=AAXkFFrao6DqKsSTWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T1Bd0-aQg-9uRa4u3dGA5fKxaj8-mEkxVzX8mhdj4Gt2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<201602060012.26728.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CABm2gDrns0+eZdLyNk=tDNbnMsC1tT1MfEY93cJf1V_8TPjmLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T2LuMZciXpMiY24+rPzhj1VT6j=HJ5STtnQmnfnA_XFUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHcfU-W9vubmuRFSb-zZgdKdCvXdO9ttZtu9T2tNxWTHcsGaTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T2ewNQn7sxc675Qz6KNF-6DfZjYBY6Q2b6GTZ42X2piwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFVRnyq7xADJz9nfH05izyfLvGuB_+z=AAXkFFrao6DqKsSTWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:58:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OUdm6L2opMTX7FKQ=qSz-ad2dhi1d9=wJMgLrwOj=tB5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a2268eb846c052b69fb08
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, 
	MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2
	megabytes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:58:02 -0000

--089e013a2268eb846c052b69fb08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:14 AM, David Vorick via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I'm not clear on the utility of more nodes. Perhaps there is significant
> concern about SPV nodes getting enough bandwidth or the network struggling
> from the load?
>

It is unfortunate that when pruning is activated, the NODE_NETWORK bit is
cleared.  This means that supporting SPV clients means running full nodes
without pruning.  OTOH, a pruning node could support SPV clients that sync
more often than once every few days, especially if it stores a few GB of
block data.

--089e013a2268eb846c052b69fb08
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:14 AM, David Vorick via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"=
>&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bl=
ank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><span class=3D""></span><span clas=
s=3D""></span><div>I&#39;m not clear on the utility of more nodes. Perhaps =
there is significant concern about SPV nodes getting enough bandwidth or th=
e network struggling from the load? </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div=
><div>It is unfortunate that when pruning is activated, the NODE_NETWORK bi=
t is cleared.=C2=A0 This means that supporting SPV clients means running fu=
ll nodes without pruning.=C2=A0 OTOH, a pruning node could support SPV clie=
nts that sync more often than once every few days, especially if it stores =
a few GB of block data.<br></div></div></div></div>

--089e013a2268eb846c052b69fb08--