summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dd/a9a10a455557b4ddcbd1d069acca3bdc56e9ca
blob: 084a1699d999b0be4efcd34391e09425409f4cb3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
Return-Path: <wtogami@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91F71385
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.214.182])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8409A155
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbfr1 with SMTP id fr1so105975839obb.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=VEPr+SGdVYylHU0H8uYtDUV3t3tpHkhhgBZTpx+lu/w=;
	b=kUA7S+zYPT2dx7UM+tCuFOnoQKOgNEsf0K/k7zjtrPpUoG/qz0IWfAAgH1YVR3AefI
	EHDmfX4QOjg2svIfD2PCgcMRXzKM9lb6siNeTs4LWsPVrw18GuWxhUsVhhJpzkD6hxQr
	zvbO+KH4fHxCUtP8U7ppHDIVUqDYyu9/KV2bE49JICpZHps5I4xYqmrHaBgldJbbZr5m
	gLvE5j93KuNMU5dLMzm3g4C5P1XQrf9kVlZxMURqy5GGFQJLbVEw5Sa5jp7VV6XIcJmn
	nsdvVinqECchIBn1OHXeiyyLdO7LUOmUhaPFg1QPHvFXOkB+V6/wsSVCr93TwY4/rtk7
	Q4mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.145.228 with SMTP id sx4mr14315339oeb.79.1441060044772;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.77.199 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:27:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEz79PoGiQc7yJckwEacNtEP_OSMUr3+yyHQTM0UgKBuRzFhfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d30da119a22051ea2f096
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Disable digests on bitcoin-dev
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:27:26 -0000

--047d7b5d30da119a22051ea2f096
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi folks,

I think we should agree to disable the ability to subscribe with digests on
bitcoin-dev list.  I think digests were from an earlier era of Internet
history.  Digests are inconvenient for everyone because replies have the
problem of breaking threads.    These days people should be setting mail
filters to separate list mail from other mail.  I think digests are really
not a net-positive for the community so we should just turn off the ability
to do it.

Any objections?

Warren Togami

--047d7b5d30da119a22051ea2f096
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi folks,<div><br></div><div>I think we should agree to di=
sable the ability to subscribe with digests on bitcoin-dev list.=C2=A0 I th=
ink digests were from an earlier era of Internet history.=C2=A0 Digests are=
 inconvenient for everyone because replies have the problem of breaking thr=
eads. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0These days people should be setting mail filters to=
 separate list mail from other mail.=C2=A0 I think digests are really not a=
 net-positive for the community so we should just turn off the ability to d=
o it.</div><div><br></div><div>Any objections?</div><div><br></div><div>War=
ren Togami</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>

--047d7b5d30da119a22051ea2f096--