1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <decker.christian@gmail.com>) id 1TNWOK-0006SD-Cm
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:10:36 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.210.47;
envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com;
helo=mail-da0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-da0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1TNWOI-0000f5-6F
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:10:36 +0000
Received: by mail-da0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s35so2241669dak.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.129.233 with SMTP id nz9mr31952161pbb.136.1350252628318;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.67.22.37 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201210142202.47221.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CA+QPp0rDb9cKThWZuvC=OuvKmh4YBWLVAcP6rFjt0g47tLaAoA@mail.gmail.com>
<201210142202.47221.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:09:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CALxbBHW9wwe9yEUZp0pEzt+optFVmmRF27rBCYoLCeb8=p4iqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ffba9d7449a6004cc0c306f
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(decker.christian[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1TNWOI-0000f5-6F
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hosting of compiled bitcoin client
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:10:36 -0000
--e89a8ffba9d7449a6004cc0c306f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Being an international team I'm pretty sure we can find someone who is in a
more permissive country.
Would someone knowledgeable point us to the specific laws, so that we can
look it up in our respective jurisdiction?
Regards,
Chris
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:52:33 PM Kyle Henderson wrote:
> > Given that sourceforge has shown to restrict access to a number of
> > countries at the request of the USA
>
> This needs some clarification. If the USA has "requested" it, then
> presumably
> there's some legality involved, and our US developers shouldn't be made
> liable
> for it. The specific reason SourceForge has restricted access should be
> made
> known so non-US developers (or gitian builders) can evaluate their own laws
> and hopefully at least one will be in a jurisdiction that allows it.
> But GitHub is also US-located, so hosting it there may be a problem too.
>
> Luke
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--e89a8ffba9d7449a6004cc0c306f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Being an international team I'm pretty sure we can find someone who is in a more permissive country.<div>Would someone knowledgeable point us to the specific laws, so that we can look it up in our respective jurisdiction?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Chris<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Luke-Jr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luke@dashjr.org" target="_blank">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:52:33 PM Kyle Henderson wrote:<br>
> Given that sourceforge has shown to restrict access to a number of<br>
> countries at the request of the USA<br>
<br>
</div>This needs some clarification. If the USA has "requested" it, then presumably<br>
there's some legality involved, and our US developers shouldn't be made liable<br>
for it. The specific reason SourceForge has restricted access should be made<br>
known so non-US developers (or gitian builders) can evaluate their own laws<br>
and hopefully at least one will be in a jurisdiction that allows it.<br>
But GitHub is also US-located, so hosting it there may be a problem too.<br>
<br>
Luke<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM<br>
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly<br>
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app<br>
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!<br>
<a href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev" target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--e89a8ffba9d7449a6004cc0c306f--
|
