1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1VBWA0-0004R1-Eq
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:34:44 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.182; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f182.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VBW9y-00010s-Mt
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:34:44 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi8so3459118wib.3
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=SpdxoAByfjb8B0P9uC3P+DL3c9UpE8MZKYtYp0hBJHw=;
b=moYbUJwQYXPPGRH/2tI+6xT9g1p0W6UrnKBA8etxBwUDIXC3q9wsGkkbTSiw8SdQKI
jIPQWs4Rnj9UpSkYEzvo0ZOAc//Lh1i0kMV4kaLgCNd2nwU0MV7pFgfXXsketPCRnRa8
TMtizukjd1RIRH1tV0YWrcOYvygo8WCGNpPJE1aryBOguqjUt+PldPEwuTPKgNukb3T/
AKRhA+L1sTjouYZadtkFH06xQ/CRPc9rObJq9DMR3LtKjQYXyiSa93yVfx+rV9ZUqOxp
3GVZtd3wYEjljjBl65XVZxXY19Uf8ieD0tiNC5DvnSQsJJLVjOb1gqFxwZ5ufbsMnS8K
N/dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzQTfDDi/Ttpx1QSoIuqQXqT3HY5eXWXNHfZVUPcVFNo6FfUTiBvugkAF7at2zINI78J0g
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.240.129 with SMTP id wa1mr6220102wjc.31.1376944476440;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.23.1 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79PpZ8a1vByinFz03efHCS71AtnFCjkXtK7My6z=QG=F92A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0MnnWw=qiYC0nJcY=BdTDcAjGtraJ+kazoG7_bHW-HBtw@mail.gmail.com>
<CALxyHsXoCqL8dNXeayibfbR7-JU6Ke19gJJ1fToboULdUa155Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQRcfbe+3A6_t4s8BJRaWwmLdKkGG1ePmG+Epm5W6CxdQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgT_9KX4tEOqehwBf=TCV1c92b3W2ADKLqwkzqvcyWseUw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEz79PpZ8a1vByinFz03efHCS71AtnFCjkXtK7My6z=QG=F92A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:34:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0MuF4r1cz1sQc=Qrf5CoHtei8CPvyAL8PBCo=Oug=hMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VBW9y-00010s-Mt
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"pooler@litecoinpool.org" <pooler@litecoinpool.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: remove "getwork" RPC from
bitcoind
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:34:44 -0000
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, Litecoin 0.8.x entirely removed the internal miner and we warned
> people that getwork will be removed in the next major version. Pooler's CPU
> minerd which supports both sha256d and scrypt recently grew stratum support.
> Perhaps he could be convinced to add GBT support too, which would help this
> goal of completely removing the internal miner and getwork.
The internal miner is still actively used for testnet, here.
--
Jeff Garzik
Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
