summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dc/390bb6e3a8902ab60bb103cb6709d1d1a29b9a
blob: ee819fda6f9a7e0ca3b1ff78c116a430cba7ff36 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1RjZxK-0004VK-8z
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:21:22 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from nm15-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.91])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RjZxJ-00052k-5z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:21:22 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.52] by nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	07 Jan 2012 17:21:15 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.246] by tm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	07 Jan 2012 17:21:15 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	07 Jan 2012 17:21:15 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 913923.56838.bm@omp1060.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 73635 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2012 17:21:15 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: HvvpOUIVM1kuHkrMWQSrGfah3Hsv8nBtp_ealmCS0OR6u0x
	_6KRs5h5Aa0Tu1EP16vEiCQlPtcMYXDQzJfZGK2aQqSu8P2ByHY0R0jWXRL1
	PPqxO40wQkVE67I7Ww6lMH2NPvCnwjuCfJiDxl1taM.QEVa_ztAYC4oQsbRb
	gFyObGmZ76dpgAVsNhX8wR8fgKaubSCg.rSBFlHzgXNSYRN4BwX75viC4.dA
	rB35OEL7pjxO4N44pOWpIwC5MZ8T5kKJ8HrpM9rjbsyj1QaK9nvUzq7oAuZk
	WvNC1DoWDfGA8SDm7YpnGSge4Vo2G4Fl6btm2GZNjBmenR0lFhT8oYnxSd1U
	fIBe.qYdChOxqt.0xx9QSk0wTp1w5pFU_KUXC_NU0icsrqH2qn_MV4Hxyrk3
	B_MgLidkAeSfh73EGEFMsWCes0rlqtwXbsPPTYbSmyJ2I395vVVcNJzJJkPg
	Lox8PUb0JJpNY
Received: from [92.20.155.29] by web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:21:15 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698
Message-ID: <1325956875.73286.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 09:21:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [98.138.91.91 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RjZxJ-00052k-5z
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Pull 748 pay to script hash
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:21:22 -0000

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/748/files

I'm reading a diff of a now defunct OP_EVAL proposal with the current pay to script hash one.

It might be better for code review if the old pull is reverted and then this one re-requested. That will make it easier to see the real changes.