summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/db/25ae9aa344900d1981fdb58a2ef3c4daee23ed
blob: ef293162a4a167613da2fe0f47107524c1387a1a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83C5E48
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  1 Sep 2015 06:54:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net (outmail148099.authsmtp.net
	[62.13.148.99])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07361A4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  1 Sep 2015 06:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
	by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t816sk2o021365;
	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:54:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (030-098.web.ny.np1.net [64.61.30.98] (may be forged))
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t816sgVg033471
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:54:44 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 02:54:42 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150901065441.GH30364@muck>
References: <CABaSBazLWrmd=iKj2sM61cfU==U4zQq95auQLbbnv4HbO_H=QQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBazLWrmd=iKj2sM61cfU==U4zQq95auQLbbnv4HbO_H=QQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 541601b5-5076-11e5-9f76-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aAdMdgMUC1AEAgsB AmMbW1NeVVl7XWY7 bQ5PawRDYUpQVg11
	VUBOXVMcUA1pB19W YEkeURp2cAQIfHx1 ZwhnWnFdXEUocFt4
	QklSCGwHMGJ9YTYY Vl1YdwFReQMbfxxA PlMxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
	GA41ejw8IwAXEyRS WB1FN18MQEsUVjky DwgYECsuGlAeQzR2
	NwYhMlkHEUpZP1U1 LVoqEWk5HD87MS08 V11cGCJCTwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 64.61.30.98/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Short review of previously-proposed exotic
 SIGHASH types
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 06:54:49 -0000


--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:56:34PM -0500, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> Here is a short review of previously-proposed and exotic SIGHASH types.
>=20
> SIGHASH_MULTIPLE
> Similarly, petertodd has asked for a SIGHASH_DONT_SIGN_TXID before to
> make OP_CODESEPARATOR more useful.

There's also my "meta sighash" idea of using code to build up the
signature with OP_CODESEPARATOR:

http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07=
384.html

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000010b552c5f5c18705ccb1b21c550c08872089f89076840d6d

--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=TSkY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c--