1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <vmartchenko@gmail.com>) id 1Rn5CF-0008B4-PQ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:15 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=vmartchenko@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Rn5CA-0004D7-9D
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:15 +0000
Received: by qap15 with SMTP id 15so2954049qap.13
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:19:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.188.137 with SMTP id da9mr18964520qab.29.1326791944891;
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Sender: vmartchenko@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.134.77 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:19:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1326760227.63298.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1326665394.7032.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CA+8xBpfWvLGtF3aP10xjTs-wyD1ia=iKLh3b=B+LqQjpRV5PVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1326760227.63298.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:04 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ktgJfiI_E59-dba8k4RgOcE4HvI
Message-ID: <CACv5nHKcDW=Dg6_sgqLEjBgPuXn9cqFsjGhHW-q+4P9kWfa9yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vladimir Marchenko <vladimir@marchenko.co.uk>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(vmartchenko[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Rn5CA-0004D7-9D
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:15 -0000
On 17 January 2012 00:30, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ...
> Wikipedia has far more need to remain neutral and apolitical than bitcoin ever does- you've read Satoshi's politically charged whitepaper or seen the genesis block quote.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action
> ...
I would like to voice my support to Amir here. It is a solidarity
gesture and from my point of view it would be great if bitcoin related
websites join the Blackout. In my view it is almost like Internet's
general strike, which is being enacted for a very good reason. To some
degree, ignoring it and continuing business as usual is almost
equivalent to being a strikebreaker.
For whatever it worth, all websites where I have some degree of
control will particpate in the blackout. Even where it means loss of
revenue for one day (actually it is likely that ad revenues tomorrow
would be easily twice the usual amount due to so many publishers
shutting down their websites.)
|
