summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/da/0a130ecaf1b0521c8c356de6d3bd67578c0bb9
blob: b3e181ff4c8b09b796ce75daa4339bc67613cdc0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <leszek@bioinfo.pl>) id 1UkWNA-0002f9-DG
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:20:44 +0000
Received: from bioinfo.pl ([150.254.161.29])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UkWN8-0001t6-H0
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:20:44 +0000
Received: from abaw139.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl ([83.6.186.139] helo=Leszek)
	by bioinfo.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <leszek@bioinfo.pl>) id 1UkW52-0002Me-GN
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:02:00 +0200
From: "Leszek Rychlewski" <leszek@bioinfo.pl>
To: "'Bitcoin Dev'" <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CAMGNxUv7wkiUYZ2nZjOP0mEW7bgR0a+CXKyDPq38joU-fMMQ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130606083116.GA23658@savin>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:01:52 +0200
Message-ID: <99A37B1BAC174809801AB928F07F4F46@Leszek>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <20130606083116.GA23658@savin>
Thread-Index: Ac5ikHiwHNHYbz2bTf6W3AWhrsTG9AAAwk2A
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-SenderDomain: bioinfo.pl
X-SenderAddress: 83.6.186.139
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1UkWN8-0001t6-H0
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revocability with known trusted escrow
	services?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:20:44 -0000

Transactions with cash are even less revocable (there is no negative cash
balance while a btc wallet can have a negative balance) so it looks like the
authorities are exploiting differences between crypto currencies and the
banking system as an excuse to prosecute members of the new industry.

Collecting arguments against such accusations should suffice [but I like the
maturation concept for dedicated accounts/transactions :-)].

Leszek