1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1RqudS-0007Ot-VK
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:10 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm12-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.41])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RqudS-0006BG-6b for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:10 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.52] by nm12.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.169] by tm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1025.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 456241.52357.bm@omp1025.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 32261 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: KfC2FCsVM1lpNg_avpsWVpCy0kdoSTb1KO7pKnbcGk_Kt.x
n.G66Ys9WLJiJgVIa9KA01XmJbpPKjtxcrJtW5aD1cqDLDmw9BBHgWU6l4jn
7pAfIlFAqTApLDZOyMafehjh5qObMZ6D5G7Qnps4uS9PuGA.5B0IZGFsBwCc
e80OxMKGAUYogeaxMVdqHijuKIVF0kgRet7etY1fPk6meJGI2x1Z7keCGwJw
Taf0jYlz5YeJIfGPZxGxG7igesOyzSoN3.Ha88uNU1lgXhS_3m9cW.N2poxH
c6nCio7QA0xV2PD.jZDZAB6yuqofB6vpw5ZGIh9vkW3fQVzYWMIynBEF80m8
Qx0OM1G3hnDk5hA3klySgcpKcMF2bHafH9UgdOZ3vkpwEYCf5ATaF6T.HeA- -
Received: from [92.20.138.208] by web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:04 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537
Message-ID: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621"
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.91.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RqudS-0006BG-6b
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:11 -0000
---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.
ATM it is Draft status.
I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.
For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement.
---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.</div><div><br></div><div>ATM it is Draft status.</div><div><br></div><div>I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.</div><div><br></div><div>For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement.</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>
---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621--
|
